PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Exosens (EXENS.PA) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

EXENS.PA is traded in EUR, while BAB.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the BAB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXENS.PA achieves a 28.14% return, which is significantly higher than BAB.L's -16.22% return.


EXENS.PA

1D
-2.52%
1M
-4.92%
YTD
28.14%
6M
40.62%
1Y
37.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BAB.L

1D
-0.54%
1M
-6.31%
YTD
-16.22%
6M
-7.68%
1Y
-1.07%
3Y*
49.67%
5Y*
28.14%
10Y*
0.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EXENS.PA
Exosens
28.14%149.94%-13.64%
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
-16.22%137.01%-4.78%

Correlation

The correlation between EXENS.PA and BAB.L is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2024

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXENS.PA
EXENS.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
EXENS.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXENS.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXENS.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EXENS.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXENS.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BAB.L
BAB.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BAB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BAB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Exosens (EXENS.PA) and Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EXENS.PABAB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.03

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

-0.03

+1.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.74

-0.08

+3.82

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXENS.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the BAB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXENS.PA and BAB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EXENS.PABAB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

-0.03

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.15

+1.25

Drawdowns

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXENS.PA drawdown since its inception was -25.04%, smaller than the maximum BAB.L drawdown of -83.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXENS.PA and BAB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EXENS.PABAB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.04%

-83.34%

+58.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.36%

-36.67%

+14.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.84%

-31.09%

+16.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.33%

-33.93%

+25.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.70%

13.98%

-4.28%

Volatility

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L - Volatility Comparison

Exosens (EXENS.PA) has a higher volatility of 14.73% compared to Babcock International Group plc (BAB.L) at 12.50%. This indicates that EXENS.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EXENS.PABAB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.73%

12.50%

+2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.96%

26.65%

+8.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.20%

36.22%

+10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.12%

34.39%

+12.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.12%

37.84%

+9.28%

Dividends

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L - Dividend Comparison

EXENS.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than BAB.L's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAB.L
Babcock International Group plc
0.68%0.56%1.06%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%6.08%4.04%2.75%2.38%
EXENS.PA
Exosens
0.49%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EXENS.PA vs. BAB.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Exosens and Babcock International Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. EXENS.PA values in EUR, BAB.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


EXENS.PA and BAB.L have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EXENS.PA and BAB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer