EXE vs. TIGR
EXE (Expand Energy Corp) and TIGR (UP Fintech Holding Limited) are both stocks. EXE operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while TIGR operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, EXE returned 14.81%/yr vs -30.09%/yr for TIGR. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EXE vs. TIGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXE achieves a -18.63% return, which is significantly higher than TIGR's -50.10% return.
EXE
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -18.63%
- 6M
- -20.38%
- 1Y
- -20.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- —
TIGR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -28.16%
- YTD
- -50.10%
- 6M
- -48.38%
- 1Y
- -44.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- -30.09%
- 10Y*
- —
EXE vs. TIGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXE Expand Energy Corp | -18.63% | 14.35% | 33.18% | -14.77% | 62.34% | 53.16% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | -50.10% | 47.99% | 46.15% | 29.62% | -30.55% | -82.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXE and TIGR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between EXE and TIGR shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.16 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EXE:
$21.37M
TIGR:
$848.95M
EXE:
$17.89
TIGR:
$0.62
EXE:
4.96
TIGR:
7.75
EXE:
1.14
TIGR:
1.37
EXE:
0.00
TIGR:
1.01
EXE:
$14.10B
TIGR:
$645.56M
EXE:
$8.89B
TIGR:
$533.82M
EXE:
$7.00B
TIGR:
$236.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXE vs. TIGR — Risk / Return Rank
EXE
TIGR
EXE vs. TIGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Expand Energy Corp (EXE) and UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXE | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | -0.68 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | -1.32 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXE vs. TIGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXE drawdown since its inception was -29.69%, smaller than the maximum TIGR drawdown of -93.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXE and TIGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXE | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.69% | -93.65% | +63.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.32% | -66.44% | +38.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -66.44% | +38.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.69% | -92.04% | +62.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.92% | -87.01% | +60.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -77.92% | +66.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.50% | 33.97% | -18.47% |
Volatility
EXE vs. TIGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Expand Energy Corp (EXE) is 7.74%, while UP Fintech Holding Limited (TIGR) has a volatility of 35.17%. This indicates that EXE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXE | TIGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 35.17% | -27.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.57% | 48.45% | -25.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.76% | 67.06% | -35.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.13% | 82.74% | -47.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.78% | 90.54% | -55.76% |
Dividends
EXE vs. TIGR - Dividend Comparison
EXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while TIGR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXE Expand Energy Corp | 3.59% | 2.89% | 2.45% | 4.70% | 10.16% | 1.74% |
TIGR UP Fintech Holding Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EXE vs. TIGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Expand Energy Corp and UP Fintech Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EXE vs. TIGR - Profitability Comparison
EXE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.3%.
TIGR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 147.59M and revenue of 155.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.0%.
EXE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported an operating income of 1.53B and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.8%.
TIGR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported an operating income of 65.89M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.4%.
EXE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported a net income of 1.16B and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 26.4%.
TIGR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UP Fintech Holding Limited reported a net income of -26.92M and revenue of 155.34M, resulting in a net margin of -17.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EXE and TIGR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIGR has higher volatility (35.17%) compared to EXE (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXE dropped -29.69% vs TIGR's -93.65%.
EXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EXE and TIGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer