EXE vs. IAG
EXE (Expand Energy Corp) and IAG (IAMGOLD Corporation) are both stocks. EXE operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while IAG operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, EXE returned 14.81%/yr vs 35.17%/yr for IAG. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
EXE vs. IAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXE achieves a -18.63% return, which is significantly lower than IAG's 0.97% return.
EXE
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -18.63%
- 6M
- -20.38%
- 1Y
- -20.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- —
IAG
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -11.39%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 120.82%
- 3Y*
- 80.32%
- 5Y*
- 35.17%
- 10Y*
- 16.20%
EXE vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXE Expand Energy Corp | -18.63% | 14.35% | 33.18% | -14.77% | 62.34% | 53.16% |
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 0.97% | 219.57% | 103.95% | -1.94% | -17.57% | -12.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between EXE and IAG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2021 | 0.21 |
The correlation between EXE and IAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
EXE:
$21.37M
IAG:
$9.89B
EXE:
$17.89
IAG:
$1.73
EXE:
4.96
IAG:
9.63
EXE:
1.14
IAG:
2.84
EXE:
0.00
IAG:
2.28
EXE:
$14.10B
IAG:
$3.42B
EXE:
$8.89B
IAG:
$1.64B
EXE:
$7.00B
IAG:
$1.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EXE vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank
EXE
IAG
EXE vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Expand Energy Corp (EXE) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EXE | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.31 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 3.07 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 7.68 | -8.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EXE vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXE drawdown since its inception was -29.69%, smaller than the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXE and IAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXE | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.69% | -95.55% | +65.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.32% | -39.60% | +11.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.32% | -39.60% | +11.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.69% | -73.69% | +44.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.92% | -32.23% | +5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.98% | -56.18% | +45.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.50% | 15.80% | -0.30% |
Volatility
EXE vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Expand Energy Corp (EXE) is 7.74%, while IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a volatility of 20.86%. This indicates that EXE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EXE | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 20.86% | -13.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.57% | 49.19% | -26.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.76% | 61.99% | -30.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.13% | 60.55% | -25.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.78% | 58.65% | -23.87% |
Dividends
EXE vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison
EXE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXE Expand Energy Corp | 3.59% | 2.89% | 2.45% | 4.70% | 10.16% | 1.74% |
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
EXE vs. IAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Expand Energy Corp and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
EXE vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison
EXE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 3.71B and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.3%.
IAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.
EXE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported an operating income of 1.53B and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.8%.
IAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.
EXE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Expand Energy Corp reported a net income of 1.16B and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 26.4%.
IAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
EXE and IAG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAG has higher volatility (20.86%) compared to EXE (7.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXE dropped -29.69% vs IAG's -95.55%.
IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EXE and IAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer