EWY vs. FGD
EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) and FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index, while FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWY returned 16.84%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for FGD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.59% expense ratio.
Performance
EWY vs. FGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than FGD's 12.92% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed FGD with an annualized return of 16.84%, while FGD has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.
EWY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 103.10%
- 6M
- 117.85%
- 1Y
- 203.95%
- 3Y*
- 46.46%
- 5Y*
- 18.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.84%
FGD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 32.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
EWY vs. FGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 103.10% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 12.92% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | -7.25% | 20.83% | -5.23% | 20.64% | -12.49% | 17.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWY and FGD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2007 | 0.63 |
The correlation between EWY and FGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWY vs. FGD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWY
FGD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Technology
EWY
FGD
Industrials
EWY
FGD
Financial Services
EWY
FGD
Consumer Cyclical
EWY
FGD
Healthcare
EWY
FGD
-
Communication Services
EWY
FGD
Basic Materials
EWY
FGD
Consumer Defensive
EWY
FGD
Energy
EWY
FGD
Utilities
EWY
FGD
Real Estate
EWY
-
FGD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWY vs. FGD — Risk / Return Rank
EWY
FGD
EWY vs. FGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWY | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.45 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.65 | 3.23 | +5.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.24 | 11.28 | +18.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWY vs. FGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than FGD's maximum drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and FGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWY | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.14% | -68.05% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.08% | -9.82% | -13.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -11.50% | -15.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.55% | -28.68% | -19.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.73% | -44.84% | -4.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.88% | -0.44% | -8.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.11% | -12.55% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.59% | 2.81% | +3.78% |
Volatility
EWY vs. FGD - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) at 3.57%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWY | FGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 3.57% | +22.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.65% | 9.98% | +32.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.51% | 12.81% | +33.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.15% | 14.95% | +15.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.06% | 18.21% | +9.85% |
EWY vs. FGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWY and FGD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.
Dividends
EWY vs. FGD - Dividend Comparison
EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FGD's 5.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.03% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.01% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWY and FGD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to FGD (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs FGD's -68.05%.
On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 10.39% for FGD. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWY and FGD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.
FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.
EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FGD is Global Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWY and FGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer