PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWY vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWY vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 103.10% return, which is significantly higher than FDT's 23.23% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed FDT with an annualized return of 16.84%, while FDT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.17% annualized return.


EWY

1D
-0.75%
1M
10.39%
YTD
103.10%
6M
117.85%
1Y
203.95%
3Y*
46.46%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
16.84%

FDT

1D
0.21%
1M
0.87%
YTD
23.23%
6M
24.33%
1Y
50.01%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWY vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
103.10%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
23.23%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EWY and FDT is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.74

The correlation between EWY and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWY vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWY
FDT

Technology

57.4%
12.1%

Industrials

14.5%
32.4%

Financial Services

9.7%
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.3%
11.9%

Healthcare

3.1%
1.3%

Communication Services

2.7%
2.8%

Basic Materials

2.5%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%
2.5%

Energy

0.7%
7.9%

Utilities

0.4%
4.8%

Real Estate

-

5.0%

Technology

EWY
57.4%
FDT
12.1%

Industrials

EWY
14.5%
FDT
32.4%

Financial Services

EWY
9.7%
FDT
9.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EWY
6.3%
FDT
11.9%

Healthcare

EWY
3.1%
FDT
1.3%

Communication Services

EWY
2.7%
FDT
2.8%

Basic Materials

EWY
2.5%
FDT
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWY
1.8%
FDT
2.5%

Energy

EWY
0.7%
FDT
7.9%

Utilities

EWY
0.4%
FDT
4.8%

Real Estate

EWY

-

FDT
5.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWY vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWY vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWYFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.46

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.65

3.70

+4.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

30.24

14.01

+16.22

EWY vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWY Sharpe Ratio is 4.29, which is higher than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWY and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWY vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, which is greater than FDT's maximum drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWYFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-46.10%

-28.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.08%

-13.41%

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-14.29%

-13.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.55%

-32.80%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

-46.10%

-3.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.88%

-3.37%

-5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.11%

-10.76%

-9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.59%

3.54%

+3.05%

Volatility

EWY vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) at 8.93%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWYFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.64%

8.93%

+16.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.65%

17.27%

+25.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.51%

19.59%

+26.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.15%

18.46%

+11.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.06%

18.62%

+9.44%

EWY vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWY vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than FDT's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.03%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.89%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWY and FDT have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (25.64%) compared to FDT (8.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 16.84% vs 11.17% for FDT. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FDT has been the lower-risk option at 8.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 16.84% return vs 11.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.03% for EWY.

EWY is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.80% for FDT.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.29 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWY and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer