PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWX vs. EMDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWX vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWX achieves a 14.25% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EWX has outperformed EMDV with an annualized return of 9.70%, while EMDV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


EWX

1D
0.39%
1M
1.26%
YTD
14.25%
6M
16.49%
1Y
27.75%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
7.18%
10Y*
9.70%

EMDV

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
0.78%
6M
0.56%
1Y
6.45%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-3.23%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWX vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWX
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
14.25%15.46%6.81%18.13%-15.00%18.15%14.84%15.59%-18.75%34.12%
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
0.78%11.90%0.06%-1.03%-18.19%1.11%-0.09%14.93%-7.52%26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EWX and EMDV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2016

0.76

The correlation between EWX and EMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWX vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWX
EMDV

Technology

16.0%
22.5%

Industrials

9.8%
6.2%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
6.2%

Financial Services

4.7%
24.1%

Healthcare

3.6%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
16.4%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Energy

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.2%
8.3%

Communication Services

0.9%
6.2%

Technology

EWX
16.0%
EMDV
22.5%

Industrials

EWX
9.8%
EMDV
6.2%

Basic Materials

EWX
6.0%
EMDV
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EWX
5.5%
EMDV
6.2%

Financial Services

EWX
4.7%
EMDV
24.1%

Healthcare

EWX
3.6%
EMDV
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

EWX
2.4%
EMDV
16.4%

Real Estate

EWX
2.3%
EMDV

-

Energy

EWX
2.0%
EMDV

-

Utilities

EWX
1.2%
EMDV
8.3%

Communication Services

EWX
0.9%
EMDV
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWX vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWX
EWX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
EWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
EWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

EMDV
EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWX vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWXEMDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.11

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

0.89

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.05

2.72

+8.33

EWX vs. EMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the EMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWX and EMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWXEMDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

0.58

+1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.21

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.14

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.21

0.00

Drawdowns

EWX vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWX drawdown since its inception was -63.90%, which is greater than EMDV's maximum drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWX and EMDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWXEMDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.90%

-39.20%

-24.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.98%

-7.24%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.37%

-20.71%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.67%

-34.97%

+10.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.00%

-39.20%

-3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-15.13%

+14.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.17%

-13.55%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.38%

+0.14%

Volatility

EWX vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF (EWX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 4.11%. This indicates that EWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWXEMDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

4.11%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

9.22%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

11.22%

+3.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

15.41%

-0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

18.26%

-1.12%

EWX vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWX vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

EWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than EMDV's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMDV
ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
2.42%2.46%2.79%1.88%3.68%2.12%3.12%2.38%1.27%2.09%2.87%0.00%
EWX
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Small Cap ETF
2.54%2.91%2.90%2.32%3.00%2.77%2.24%2.73%3.26%2.30%2.46%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWX and EMDV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to EMDV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWX dropped -63.90% vs EMDV's -39.20%.

On 10-year performance, EWX leads with 9.70% vs 2.53% for EMDV. On fees, EMDV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWX has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 2.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMDV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for EWX.

EWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 2.42% for EMDV.

EWX tracks S&P Emerging Markets Under USD2 Billion Index, while EMDV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for EWX and 0.60% for EMDV.

EWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWX and EMDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer