EWW vs. IBIT
EWW (iShares MSCI Mexico ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWW is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, EWW returned 34.15% vs -38.74% for IBIT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWW charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
EWW vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWW achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.
EWW
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 12.62%
- 6M
- 16.29%
- 1Y
- 34.15%
- 3Y*
- 12.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -18.50%
- YTD
- -25.48%
- 6M
- -29.84%
- 1Y
- -38.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWW vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 12.62% | 53.65% | -26.24% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -25.48% | -6.41% | 99.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWW and IBIT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWW vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
EWW
IBIT
EWW vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWW | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | -0.89 | +2.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.27 | -1.23 | +3.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.86 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | -0.79 | +3.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.08 | -1.36 | +10.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWW | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | -0.89 | +2.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.30 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
EWW vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWW | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.94% | -49.36% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.98% | -49.36% | +35.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.88% | -48.10% | +44.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.52% | -16.02% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 28.44% | -24.67% |
Volatility
EWW vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) is 5.79%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that EWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWW | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 9.50% | -3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.75% | 34.44% | -16.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.15% | 43.73% | -22.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 50.19% | -27.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 50.19% | -24.80% |
EWW vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWW vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWW iShares MSCI Mexico ETF | 3.09% | 3.48% | 4.39% | 2.19% | 3.64% | 2.06% | 1.43% | 2.92% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 1.77% | 2.34% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWW and IBIT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to EWW (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWW dropped -64.94% vs IBIT's -49.36%.
On 1-year performance, EWW leads with 34.15% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EWW has been the lower-risk option at 5.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EWW has performed better with a 34.15% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWW.
EWW has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
EWW is categorized as Latin America Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWW and 0.25% for IBIT.
EWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWW and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer