PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWW vs. EWZS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWW vs. EWZS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWW achieves a 12.62% return, which is significantly higher than EWZS's 4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EWW has underperformed EWZS with an annualized return of 7.35%, while EWZS has yielded a comparatively higher 7.86% annualized return.


EWW

1D
-1.26%
1M
3.21%
YTD
12.62%
6M
16.29%
1Y
34.15%
3Y*
12.42%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
7.35%

EWZS

1D
-4.37%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
4.95%
6M
-2.70%
1Y
8.41%
3Y*
2.41%
5Y*
-4.16%
10Y*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWW vs. EWZS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
12.62%53.65%-28.22%40.32%1.24%20.27%-3.06%12.64%-14.58%14.47%
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
4.95%45.18%-35.95%32.65%-11.20%-14.09%-20.86%50.60%-7.13%54.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EWW and EWZS is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.55

The correlation between EWW and EWZS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWW vs. EWZS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWW
EWZS

Consumer Defensive

24.9%
10.9%

Basic Materials

23.7%
16.5%

Financial Services

18.1%
10.4%

Industrials

13.1%
8.6%

Communication Services

10.4%

-

Real Estate

7.7%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
15.5%

Healthcare

0.5%
4.8%

Energy

-

4.8%

Technology

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

12.1%

Consumer Defensive

EWW
24.9%
EWZS
10.9%

Basic Materials

EWW
23.7%
EWZS
16.5%

Financial Services

EWW
18.1%
EWZS
10.4%

Industrials

EWW
13.1%
EWZS
8.6%

Communication Services

EWW
10.4%
EWZS

-

Real Estate

EWW
7.7%
EWZS
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWW
1.4%
EWZS
15.5%

Healthcare

EWW
0.5%
EWZS
4.8%

Energy

EWW

-

EWZS
4.8%

Technology

EWW

-

EWZS
3.0%

Utilities

EWW

-

EWZS
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWW vs. EWZS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWW
EWW Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
EWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWW Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWW Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

EWZS
EWZS Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EWZS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWZS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWZS Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EWZS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWZS Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWW vs. EWZS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) and iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWWEWZSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

0.28

+1.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

0.60

+1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.07

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

0.50

+1.96

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.08

1.24

+7.84

EWW vs. EWZS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWW Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the EWZS Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWW and EWZS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWWEWZSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.28

+1.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

-0.13

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.21

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.03

+0.33

Drawdowns

EWW vs. EWZS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWW drawdown since its inception was -64.94%, smaller than the maximum EWZS drawdown of -79.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWW and EWZS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWWEWZSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.94%

-79.23%

+14.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-17.05%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.17%

-37.55%

+6.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.17%

-48.78%

+17.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.62%

-63.15%

+9.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.88%

-30.99%

+27.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.52%

-36.57%

+18.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

6.79%

-3.02%

Volatility

EWW vs. EWZS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Mexico ETF (EWW) is 5.79%, while iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF (EWZS) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that EWW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWZS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWWEWZSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.79%

11.03%

-5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.75%

25.56%

-7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.15%

30.44%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.51%

33.12%

-10.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.39%

36.79%

-11.40%

EWW vs. EWZS - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWW has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than EWZS's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWW vs. EWZS - Dividend Comparison

EWW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, less than EWZS's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWW
iShares MSCI Mexico ETF
3.09%3.48%4.39%2.19%3.64%2.06%1.43%2.92%2.30%2.22%1.77%2.34%
EWZS
iShares MSCI Brazil Small-Cap ETF
3.69%3.88%4.93%2.75%4.61%4.51%1.15%1.77%4.35%3.41%3.62%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWW and EWZS have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWZS has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to EWW (5.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWW dropped -64.94% vs EWZS's -79.23%.

On 10-year performance, EWZS leads with 7.86% vs 7.35% for EWW. On fees, EWW is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWW has been the lower-risk option at 5.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWZS has performed better with a 7.86% return vs 7.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWW is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWZS.

EWZS has the higher dividend yield at 3.69%, compared with 3.09% for EWW.

EWW tracks MSCI Mexico IMI 25/50 Index, while EWZS tracks MSCI Brazil Small Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWW and 0.59% for EWZS.

EWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWW and EWZS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer