EWV vs. OOQB
EWV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan) and OOQB (Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWV is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (-200%), while OOQB is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Volatility Shares. EWV is passively managed, while OOQB is actively managed. Over the past year, EWV returned -43.86% vs -27.35% for OOQB. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. EWV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for OOQB.
Performance
EWV vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWV achieves a -27.97% return, which is significantly lower than OOQB's -18.43% return.
EWV
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- -27.97%
- 6M
- -29.61%
- 1Y
- -43.86%
- 3Y*
- -28.45%
- 5Y*
- -17.58%
- 10Y*
- -20.24%
OOQB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -18.43%
- 6M
- -24.99%
- 1Y
- -27.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EWV vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | -27.97% | -33.23% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | -18.43% | -13.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWV and OOQB is -0.38, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWV vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank
EWV
OOQB
EWV vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWV | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.94 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -0.51 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | -0.91 | -0.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWV | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.11 | -0.53 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | -0.41 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
EWV vs. OOQB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWV drawdown since its inception was -99.13%, which is greater than OOQB's maximum drawdown of -53.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWV and OOQB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWV | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.13% | -53.44% | -45.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.88% | -53.44% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.13% | -43.69% | -55.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.28% | -23.26% | -61.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.05% | 30.11% | -1.06% |
Volatility
EWV vs. OOQB - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) has a higher volatility of 9.11% compared to Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB) at 0.00%. This indicates that EWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OOQB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWV | OOQB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 0.00% | +9.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.22% | 39.39% | -8.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.88% | 51.57% | -11.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.62% | 58.12% | -21.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.95% | 58.12% | -23.17% |
EWV vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWV vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison
EWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, less than OOQB's 11.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | 4.98% | 3.63% | 3.39% | 3.42% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% |
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF | 11.62% | 9.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWV and OOQB have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWV has higher volatility (9.11%) compared to OOQB (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWV dropped -99.13% vs OOQB's -53.44%.
On 1-year performance, OOQB leads with -27.35% vs -43.86% for EWV. On fees, OOQB is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, OOQB has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OOQB has performed better with a -27.35% return vs -43.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OOQB is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EWV.
OOQB has the higher dividend yield at 11.62%, compared with 4.98% for EWV.
EWV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while OOQB is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Volatility Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EWV and 0.75% for OOQB.
OOQB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.53 vs -1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWV and OOQB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer