EWV vs. DBJP
EWV (ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan) and DBJP (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - EWV tracks the MSCI Japan Index (-200%) while DBJP tracks the MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWV returned -20.00%/yr vs 16.71%/yr for DBJP. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. EWV charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for DBJP.
Performance
EWV vs. DBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWV achieves a -29.93% return, which is significantly lower than DBJP's 23.02% return. Over the past 10 years, EWV has underperformed DBJP with an annualized return of -20.00%, while DBJP has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.
EWV
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- -4.20%
- 6M
- -23.47%
- YTD
- -29.93%
- 1Y
- -47.17%
- 3Y*
- -28.49%
- 5Y*
- -18.46%
- 10Y*
- -20.00%
DBJP
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 15.87%
- YTD
- 23.02%
- 1Y
- 53.32%
- 3Y*
- 29.59%
- 5Y*
- 22.29%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
EWV vs. DBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | -29.93% | -37.70% | -11.06% | -28.34% | 34.35% | -10.19% | -38.57% | -30.38% | 29.90% | -36.24% |
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 23.02% | 29.51% | 25.53% | 36.21% | -4.19% | 13.04% | 10.53% | 20.87% | -14.82% | 21.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWV and DBJP is -0.88, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2011 | -0.81 |
The correlation between EWV and DBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.88 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWV vs. DBJP — Risk / Return Rank
EWV
DBJP
EWV vs. DBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWV | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.47 | -0.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.92 | 5.16 | -6.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 19.11 | -20.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWV vs. DBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWV drawdown since its inception was -99.20%, which is greater than DBJP's maximum drawdown of -31.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWV and DBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWV | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.20% | -31.30% | -67.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.16% | -10.39% | -40.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -71.19% | -21.50% | -49.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.51% | -21.50% | -58.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.92% | -31.30% | -58.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.16% | -2.75% | -96.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.34% | -7.25% | -77.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.87% | 2.80% | +30.07% |
Volatility
EWV vs. DBJP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) has a higher volatility of 14.40% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF (DBJP) at 7.38%. This indicates that EWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWV | DBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.40% | 7.38% | +7.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.86% | 15.74% | +19.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.40% | 20.10% | +22.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.25% | 19.21% | +18.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.15% | 19.25% | +15.90% |
EWV vs. DBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DBJP's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWV vs. DBJP - Dividend Comparison
EWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than DBJP's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBJP Xtrackers MSCI Japan Hedged Equity ETF | 1.23% | 2.81% | 2.80% | 5.21% | 0.80% | 2.30% | 2.53% | 2.56% | 3.87% | 2.07% | 1.13% | 5.95% |
EWV ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan | 5.16% | 3.63% | 3.39% | 3.42% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWV and DBJP have a correlation of -0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWV has higher volatility (14.40%) compared to DBJP (7.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWV dropped -99.20% vs DBJP's -31.30%.
On 10-year performance, DBJP leads with 16.71% vs -20.00% for EWV. On fees, DBJP is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, DBJP has been the lower-risk option at 7.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBJP has performed better with a 16.71% return vs -20.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBJP is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EWV.
EWV has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 1.23% for DBJP.
EWV tracks MSCI Japan Index (-200%), while DBJP tracks MSCI Japan US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EWV and 0.45% for DBJP.
DBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWV and DBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer