PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWV vs. BBJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWV vs. BBJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWV achieves a -33.77% return, which is significantly lower than BBJP's 18.56% return.


EWV

1D
-1.36%
1M
-12.15%
YTD
-33.77%
6M
-34.15%
1Y
-50.94%
3Y*
-31.03%
5Y*
-19.70%
10Y*
-21.19%

BBJP

1D
0.26%
1M
4.90%
YTD
18.56%
6M
19.07%
1Y
39.15%
3Y*
19.88%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWV vs. BBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EWV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
-33.77%-37.70%-11.06%-28.34%34.35%-10.19%-38.57%-30.38%34.05%
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
18.56%26.55%7.47%20.65%-17.24%1.21%15.42%18.85%-13.92%

Correlation

The correlation between EWV and BBJP is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2018

-0.98

The correlation between EWV and BBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWV vs. BBJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWV
EWV Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
EWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWV Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWV Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BBJP
BBJP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BBJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBJP Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BBJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWV vs. BBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWVBBJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.76

1.36

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.00

2.89

-3.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.66

9.66

-11.32

EWV vs. BBJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWV Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the BBJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWV and BBJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWV vs. BBJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWV drawdown since its inception was -99.20%, which is greater than BBJP's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWV and BBJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWVBBJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.20%

-32.66%

-66.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.16%

-13.60%

-37.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.19%

-14.49%

-56.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-79.51%

-32.66%

-46.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.20%

0.00%

-99.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.30%

-8.48%

-75.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.78%

4.06%

+26.72%

Volatility

EWV vs. BBJP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan (EWV) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) at 5.97%. This indicates that EWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWVBBJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.52%

5.97%

+6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.97%

15.78%

+17.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.15%

20.01%

+21.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.93%

18.28%

+18.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.06%

18.34%

+16.72%

EWV vs. BBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWV has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BBJP's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWV vs. BBJP - Dividend Comparison

EWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.41%, more than BBJP's 4.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBJP
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF
4.53%5.37%2.80%3.05%1.52%2.89%1.12%2.31%0.65%
EWV
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
5.41%3.63%3.39%3.42%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.33%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWV and BBJP have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWV has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to BBJP (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWV dropped -99.20% vs BBJP's -32.66%.

On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 10.06% vs -19.70% for EWV. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBJP has been the lower-risk option at 5.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 10.06% return vs -19.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EWV.

EWV has the higher dividend yield at 5.41%, compared with 4.53% for BBJP.

EWV is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BBJP is Japan Equities. EWV tracks MSCI Japan Index (-200%), while BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for EWV and 0.19% for BBJP.

BBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWV and BBJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer