PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWU vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWU vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWU achieves a 5.57% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 66.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EWU has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 8.18%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 36.92% annualized return.


EWU

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
5.57%
6M
9.86%
1Y
19.69%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
8.18%

SMH

1D
5.00%
1M
5.58%
YTD
66.10%
6M
62.81%
1Y
137.42%
3Y*
60.43%
5Y*
37.89%
10Y*
36.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWU vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
5.57%34.95%6.74%12.40%-4.39%18.19%-11.80%21.29%-14.30%21.54%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
66.10%49.17%39.10%73.38%-33.53%42.13%55.53%64.45%-9.05%38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between EWU and SMH is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000

0.51

The correlation between EWU and SMH shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWU vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWU
SMH

Financial Services

26.6%

-

Healthcare

13.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

13.9%

-

Industrials

12.7%

-

Energy

11.1%

-

Basic Materials

9.1%

-

Utilities

4.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.6%

-

Communication Services

2.2%

-

Technology

0.6%
100.0%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Financial Services

EWU
26.6%
SMH

-

Healthcare

EWU
13.9%
SMH

-

Consumer Defensive

EWU
13.9%
SMH

-

Industrials

EWU
12.7%
SMH

-

Energy

EWU
11.1%
SMH

-

Basic Materials

EWU
9.1%
SMH

-

Utilities

EWU
4.9%
SMH

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWU
3.6%
SMH

-

Communication Services

EWU
2.2%
SMH

-

Technology

EWU
0.6%
SMH
100.0%

Real Estate

EWU
0.6%
SMH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWU vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWU
EWU Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWU Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWU vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWUSMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.62

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

9.26

-7.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

34.80

-27.68

EWU vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWU Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWU and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWUSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

4.27

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.08

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

1.13

-0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.33

-0.07

Drawdowns

EWU vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWU drawdown since its inception was -63.99%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWU and SMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWUSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.99%

-84.96%

+20.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-14.93%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-35.74%

+23.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-45.30%

+20.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.33%

-45.30%

+1.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.62%

-6.23%

+1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-41.07%

+26.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

3.96%

-1.19%

Volatility

EWU vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) is 4.68%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 15.45%. This indicates that EWU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWUSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

15.45%

-10.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

26.71%

-14.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.47%

32.42%

-17.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

35.32%

-18.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

32.75%

-13.90%

EWU vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWU has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWU vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

EWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
3.53%3.73%4.16%4.14%3.43%4.35%2.48%4.13%4.98%3.91%3.97%4.11%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.18%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWU and SMH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMH has higher volatility (15.45%) compared to EWU (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWU dropped -63.99% vs SMH's -84.96%.

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 36.92% vs 8.18% for EWU. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWU has been the lower-risk option at 4.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 36.92% return vs 8.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWU.

EWU has the higher dividend yield at 3.53%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

EWU is categorized as Europe Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWU and 0.35% for SMH.

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWU and SMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer