PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWU vs. EWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWU vs. EWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWU achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly lower than EWN's 19.59% return. Over the past 10 years, EWU has underperformed EWN with an annualized return of 7.86%, while EWN has yielded a comparatively higher 12.93% annualized return.


EWU

1D
0.99%
1M
0.93%
YTD
6.59%
6M
10.05%
1Y
21.33%
3Y*
17.73%
5Y*
10.86%
10Y*
7.86%

EWN

1D
1.27%
1M
7.50%
YTD
19.59%
6M
20.46%
1Y
34.80%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
12.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWU vs. EWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
6.59%34.95%6.74%12.40%-4.39%18.19%-11.80%21.29%-14.30%21.54%
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
19.59%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%33.73%

Correlation

The correlation between EWU and EWN is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996

0.70

The correlation between EWU and EWN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWU vs. EWN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWU
EWN

Financial Services

26.0%
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
11.5%

Healthcare

13.9%
2.6%

Industrials

12.1%
10.2%

Energy

11.0%
2.1%

Basic Materials

9.3%
3.1%

Utilities

5.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
1.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
14.7%

Technology

0.6%
34.8%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.7%

Financial Services

EWU
26.0%
EWN
18.1%

Consumer Defensive

EWU
14.2%
EWN
11.5%

Healthcare

EWU
13.9%
EWN
2.6%

Industrials

EWU
12.1%
EWN
10.2%

Energy

EWU
11.0%
EWN
2.1%

Basic Materials

EWU
9.3%
EWN
3.1%

Utilities

EWU
5.1%
EWN

-

Consumer Cyclical

EWU
4.0%
EWN
1.5%

Communication Services

EWU
2.4%
EWN
14.7%

Technology

EWU
0.6%
EWN
34.8%

Real Estate

EWU
0.6%
EWN
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWU vs. EWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWU
EWU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWU Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWU vs. EWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) and iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWUEWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.64

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

9.98

-2.18

EWU vs. EWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWU Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the EWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWU and EWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWUEWNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.49

1.78

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.39

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.61

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.31

-0.04

Drawdowns

EWU vs. EWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWU drawdown since its inception was -63.99%, roughly equal to the maximum EWN drawdown of -65.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWU and EWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWUEWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.99%

-65.22%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-13.24%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.63%

-19.77%

+7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.91%

-43.57%

+18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.33%

-43.57%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-0.04%

-3.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.16%

-16.35%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

3.49%

-0.75%

Volatility

EWU vs. EWN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) is 5.64%, while iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that EWU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWUEWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

7.31%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

16.41%

-4.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

19.70%

-5.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.43%

22.89%

-6.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

21.36%

-2.52%

EWU vs. EWN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWU and EWN have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

EWU vs. EWN - Dividend Comparison

EWU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than EWN's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.21%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
3.50%3.73%4.16%4.14%3.43%4.35%2.48%4.13%4.98%3.91%3.97%4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWU and EWN have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to EWU (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWU dropped -63.99% vs EWN's -65.22%.

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 12.93% vs 7.86% for EWU. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, EWU has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 7.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWU and EWN have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 3.50% for EWU.

EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index, while EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index.

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWU and EWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer