PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWS vs. SHLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWS vs. SHLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 5.96% return, which is significantly higher than SHLD's -1.50% return.


EWS

1D
0.07%
1M
0.24%
YTD
5.96%
6M
7.68%
1Y
18.15%
3Y*
20.28%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
7.88%

SHLD

1D
-2.04%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
-1.50%
6M
-1.03%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWS vs. SHLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
5.96%31.35%22.10%4.79%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
-1.50%74.16%35.03%12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between EWS and SHLD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2023

0.38

EWS vs. SHLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWS
SHLD

Financial Services

52.2%

-

Industrials

18.1%
88.2%

Real Estate

8.6%

-

Utilities

4.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Communication Services

4.2%

-

Technology

4.0%
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Financial Services

EWS
52.2%
SHLD

-

Industrials

EWS
18.1%
SHLD
88.2%

Real Estate

EWS
8.6%
SHLD

-

Utilities

EWS
4.7%
SHLD

-

Consumer Defensive

EWS
4.6%
SHLD

-

Communication Services

EWS
4.2%
SHLD

-

Technology

EWS
4.0%
SHLD
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EWS
3.5%
SHLD

-

Basic Materials

EWS

-

SHLD

-

Energy

EWS

-

SHLD

-

Healthcare

EWS

-

SHLD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWS vs. SHLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SHLD
SHLD Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
SHLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHLD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SHLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHLD Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWS vs. SHLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWSSHLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.09

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

0.52

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

1.28

+4.12

EWS vs. SHLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is higher than the SHLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWS and SHLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWS vs. SHLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.13%, which is greater than SHLD's maximum drawdown of -20.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and SHLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWSSHLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.13%

-20.10%

-55.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-20.10%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.77%

-18.20%

+15.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.98%

-3.34%

-18.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.23%

8.12%

-4.89%

Volatility

EWS vs. SHLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) is 5.05%, while Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that EWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWSSHLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.05%

9.05%

-4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

19.94%

-7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

24.55%

-9.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

21.29%

-3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.04%

21.29%

-3.25%

EWS vs. SHLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWS and SHLD have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

EWS vs. SHLD - Dividend Comparison

EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than SHLD's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
3.87%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%
SHLD
Global X Defense Tech ETF
0.56%0.55%0.53%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWS and SHLD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHLD has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to EWS (5.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.13% vs SHLD's -20.10%.

On 1-year performance, EWS leads with 18.15% vs 8.26% for SHLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 5.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EWS has performed better with a 18.15% return vs 8.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWS and SHLD have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.56% for SHLD.

EWS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while SHLD is Aerospace & Defense. EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while SHLD tracks Global X Defense Tech Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.

EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWS and SHLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer