PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWS vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWS vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 7.91%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


EWS

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.60%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.37%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
7.91%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWS vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
8.22%31.35%22.10%6.15%-9.80%5.47%-8.47%14.54%-11.34%34.78%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EWS and IVV is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2000

0.61

The correlation between EWS and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWS vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWS
IVV

Financial Services

52.2%
11.8%

Industrials

18.1%
8.3%

Real Estate

8.6%
1.9%

Utilities

4.7%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
4.9%

Communication Services

4.2%
11.2%

Technology

4.0%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
10.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Financial Services

EWS
52.2%
IVV
11.8%

Industrials

EWS
18.1%
IVV
8.3%

Real Estate

EWS
8.6%
IVV
1.9%

Utilities

EWS
4.7%
IVV
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWS
4.6%
IVV
4.9%

Communication Services

EWS
4.2%
IVV
11.2%

Technology

EWS
4.0%
IVV
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EWS
3.5%
IVV
10.1%

Basic Materials

EWS

-

IVV
1.8%

Energy

EWS

-

IVV
3.5%

Healthcare

EWS

-

IVV
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWS vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWS vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWSIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

3.17

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.08

14.71

-8.63

EWS vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWS and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWSIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

2.39

-1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.83

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.86

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.45

-0.31

Drawdowns

EWS vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, which is greater than IVV's maximum drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWSIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.00%

-55.25%

-19.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-8.89%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-18.75%

+2.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

-24.53%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.84%

-33.90%

-6.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.76%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-10.78%

-11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

1.91%

+1.29%

Volatility

EWS vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that EWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWSIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

2.87%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

8.90%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

11.80%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

16.88%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

18.05%

-0.02%

EWS vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWS vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
3.79%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWS and IVV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWS has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.00% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 7.91% for EWS. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWS.

EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

EWS is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWS and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer