PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWS vs. EWY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWS vs. EWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWS achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 119.05% return. Over the past 10 years, EWS has underperformed EWY with an annualized return of 7.91%, while EWY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.


EWS

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.60%
YTD
8.22%
6M
8.37%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
21.86%
5Y*
9.39%
10Y*
7.91%

EWY

1D
-0.73%
1M
30.18%
YTD
119.05%
6M
134.13%
1Y
251.82%
3Y*
51.99%
5Y*
20.31%
10Y*
17.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWS vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
8.22%31.35%22.10%6.15%-9.80%5.47%-8.47%14.54%-11.34%34.78%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
119.05%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%

Correlation

The correlation between EWS and EWY is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2000

0.63

The correlation between EWS and EWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.63 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWS vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWS
EWY

Financial Services

52.2%
9.6%

Industrials

18.1%
20.4%

Real Estate

8.6%

-

Utilities

4.7%
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
1.7%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.9%

Technology

4.0%
52.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
5.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Energy

-

1.4%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Financial Services

EWS
52.2%
EWY
9.6%

Industrials

EWS
18.1%
EWY
20.4%

Real Estate

EWS
8.6%
EWY

-

Utilities

EWS
4.7%
EWY
0.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWS
4.6%
EWY
1.7%

Communication Services

EWS
4.2%
EWY
2.9%

Technology

EWS
4.0%
EWY
52.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EWS
3.5%
EWY
5.7%

Basic Materials

EWS

-

EWY
2.0%

Energy

EWS

-

EWY
1.4%

Healthcare

EWS

-

EWY
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWS vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWS
EWS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
EWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
EWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWS Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWS vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWSEWYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

6.02

-4.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.96

5.31

-3.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.74

-0.51

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

10.99

-8.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.08

40.91

-34.83

EWS vs. EWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWS Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the EWY Sharpe Ratio of 6.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWS and EWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWSEWYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

6.02

-4.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.71

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.64

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.33

-0.19

Drawdowns

EWS vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWS drawdown since its inception was -75.00%, roughly equal to the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWS and EWY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWSEWYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.00%

-74.14%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.82%

-23.08%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.34%

-27.36%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.06%

-48.55%

+19.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.84%

-49.73%

+8.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.73%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-20.13%

-1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

6.19%

-2.99%

Volatility

EWS vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) is 3.68%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 20.32%. This indicates that EWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWSEWYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

20.32%

-16.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.45%

37.41%

-25.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

42.10%

-27.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

28.83%

-11.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.03%

27.37%

-9.34%

EWS vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWS has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWS vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison

EWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than EWY's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWS
iShares MSCI Singapore ETF
3.79%4.10%4.28%6.50%2.56%6.00%2.68%4.70%4.21%3.46%3.96%4.20%
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
0.96%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWS and EWY have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (20.32%) compared to EWS (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWS dropped -75.00% vs EWY's -74.14%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 17.46% vs 7.91% for EWS. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.

EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 0.96% for EWY.

EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWS and 0.59% for EWY.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.02 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWS and EWY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer