EWQ vs. NORW
EWQ (iShares MSCI France ETF) and NORW (Global X MSCI Norway ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EWQ tracks the MSCI France Index while NORW tracks the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWQ returned 9.13%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for NORW. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
EWQ vs. NORW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWQ achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 26.31% return. Over the past 10 years, EWQ has underperformed NORW with an annualized return of 9.13%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively higher 9.61% annualized return.
EWQ
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 9.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.13%
NORW
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- 26.31%
- 6M
- 31.64%
- 1Y
- 36.12%
- 3Y*
- 23.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
EWQ vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWQ iShares MSCI France ETF | 1.20% | 28.90% | -5.63% | 21.71% | -12.05% | 21.43% | 2.86% | 26.69% | -12.90% | 29.11% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 26.31% | 32.59% | -2.50% | 5.03% | -12.55% | 13.65% | 26.00% | 14.39% | -10.39% | 24.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWQ and NORW is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2009 | 0.74 |
Over the past year, the correlation between EWQ and NORW has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
EWQ vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWQ
NORW
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
EWQ
NORW
Financial Services
EWQ
NORW
Consumer Cyclical
EWQ
NORW
Healthcare
EWQ
NORW
-
Consumer Defensive
EWQ
NORW
Energy
EWQ
NORW
Basic Materials
EWQ
NORW
Technology
EWQ
NORW
Communication Services
EWQ
NORW
Utilities
EWQ
NORW
Real Estate
EWQ
NORW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWQ vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank
EWQ
NORW
EWQ vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWQ | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.37 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.67 | 3.95 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.08 | 11.27 | -9.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWQ | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 2.18 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.37 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.40 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
EWQ vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWQ drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWQ and NORW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWQ | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.41% | -35.62% | -25.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -9.18% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.16% | -16.06% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.46% | -32.78% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.23% | -33.86% | -5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.83% | -3.53% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -10.13% | -5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 3.21% | +1.25% |
Volatility
EWQ vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI France ETF (EWQ) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.06%. This indicates that EWQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWQ | NORW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 4.06% | +2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.52% | 12.73% | +0.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.15% | 16.70% | +0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 21.88% | -2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.81% | 20.80% | +0.01% |
EWQ vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWQ and NORW have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
EWQ vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison
EWQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than NORW's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWQ iShares MSCI France ETF | 2.60% | 2.63% | 3.31% | 2.73% | 3.23% | 3.79% | 1.02% | 2.44% | 2.90% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 2.25% |
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF | 2.72% | 3.44% | 6.02% | 5.27% | 4.01% | 1.51% | 1.13% | 2.47% | 3.53% | 3.64% | 3.79% | 2.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWQ and NORW have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWQ has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to NORW (4.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWQ dropped -61.41% vs NORW's -35.62%.
On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 9.61% vs 9.13% for EWQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 9.61% return vs 9.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWQ and NORW have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
NORW has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 2.60% for EWQ.
EWQ tracks MSCI France Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X.
NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWQ and NORW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer