EWP vs. GSIB

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EWP (iShares MSCI Spain ETF) and GSIB (Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWP is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Spain Index, while GSIB is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Themes. EWP is passively managed, while GSIB is actively managed. Over the past year, EWP returned 39.17% vs 47.83% for GSIB. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GSIB.

Performance

EWP vs. GSIB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWP achieves a 8.89% return, which is significantly lower than GSIB's 13.98% return.

EWP

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 4.32%
• YTD: 8.89%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 39.17%
• 3Y*: 32.21%
• 5Y*: 17.57%
• 10Y*: 12.33%

GSIB

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 6.99%
• YTD: 13.98%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 47.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWP vs. GSIB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF	8.89%	78.03%	5.70%	-0.49%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	13.98%	61.67%	32.86%	1.75%

Correlation

The correlation between EWP and GSIB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2023	0.72

The correlation between EWP and GSIB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWP vs. GSIB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWP	GSIB
Financial Services	41.4%	100.0%
Utilities	21.2%	-
Industrials	16.1%	-
Energy	5.3%	-
Technology	4.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	-
Communication Services	2.9%	-
Real Estate	2.9%	-
Healthcare	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-

Return for Risk

EWP vs. GSIB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWP

EWP Risk / Return Rank: 69
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 65
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 71

GSIB

GSIB Risk / Return Rank: 81
GSIB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
GSIB Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GSIB Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
GSIB Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWP vs. GSIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) and Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWP	GSIB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.59	-0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	3.58	-0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.43	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	3.28	-0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.51	11.54	-0.03

EWP vs. GSIB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWP Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the GSIB Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWP and GSIB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWP vs. GSIB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWP drawdown since its inception was -61.19%, which is greater than GSIB's maximum drawdown of -17.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWP and GSIB.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWP	GSIB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.19%	-17.71%	-43.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.38%	-13.90%	+2.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.41%	-2.05%	-19.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.94%	-0.72%

Volatility

EWP vs. GSIB - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) has a higher volatility of 6.21% compared to Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) at 5.59%. This indicates that EWP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWP	GSIB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.21%	5.59%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.09%	14.41%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.13%	17.63%	+1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.31%	18.51%	+1.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.22%	18.51%	+3.71%

EWP vs. GSIB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWP vs. GSIB - Dividend Comparison

EWP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, more than GSIB's 1.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWP iShares MSCI Spain ETF	2.09%	2.27%	4.35%	2.70%	3.07%	3.29%	2.56%	3.72%	3.69%	2.72%	4.65%	3.85%
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF	1.67%	1.91%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWP and GSIB in my portfolio?

EWP and GSIB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWP or GSIB?

EWP has higher volatility (6.21%) compared to GSIB (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWP dropped -61.19% vs GSIB's -17.71%.

Which ETF is better, EWP or GSIB?

On 1-year performance, GSIB leads with 47.83% vs 39.17% for EWP. On fees, GSIB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GSIB has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWP or GSIB?

Over the 1-year period, GSIB has performed better with a 47.83% return vs 39.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWP or GSIB?

GSIB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWP or GSIB?

EWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.67% for GSIB.

What is the main difference between EWP and GSIB?

EWP is categorized as Europe Equities, while GSIB is Financials Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWP and 0.35% for GSIB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.