EWO vs. SGDM
EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and SGDM (Sprott Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while SGDM is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWO returned 15.10%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for SGDM. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SGDM.
Performance
EWO vs. SGDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than SGDM's -4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, EWO has outperformed SGDM with an annualized return of 15.10%, while SGDM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.84% annualized return.
EWO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 6.75%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 6M
- 23.71%
- 1Y
- 48.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
SGDM
- 1D
- 3.49%
- 1M
- -14.98%
- YTD
- -4.58%
- 6M
- -4.02%
- 1Y
- 43.72%
- 3Y*
- 37.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.84%
EWO vs. SGDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 18.55% | 74.21% | 4.05% | 20.63% | -21.95% | 31.50% | -3.67% | 17.05% | -22.88% | 52.47% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | -4.58% | 153.46% | 12.14% | 2.34% | -8.23% | -9.15% | 21.85% | 44.27% | -15.14% | 10.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWO and SGDM is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.24 |
The correlation between EWO and SGDM shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWO vs. SGDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWO
SGDM
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
EWO
SGDM
-
Industrials
EWO
SGDM
-
Basic Materials
EWO
SGDM
Energy
EWO
SGDM
-
Utilities
EWO
SGDM
-
Technology
EWO
SGDM
-
Real Estate
EWO
SGDM
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWO
SGDM
-
Communication Services
EWO
-
SGDM
-
Consumer Defensive
EWO
-
SGDM
-
Healthcare
EWO
-
SGDM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWO vs. SGDM — Risk / Return Rank
EWO
SGDM
EWO vs. SGDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWO | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.20 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 1.30 | +1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | 3.60 | +7.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWO vs. SGDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than SGDM's maximum drawdown of -54.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and SGDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWO | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -54.95% | -20.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -35.96% | +21.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.75% | -35.96% | +19.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.82% | -45.06% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.10% | -49.69% | -8.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -30.31% | +30.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -25.46% | -2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 12.93% | -8.77% |
Volatility
EWO vs. SGDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) is 7.31%, while Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) has a volatility of 16.53%. This indicates that EWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWO | SGDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 16.53% | -9.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.88% | 38.64% | -22.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.19% | 46.24% | -27.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 36.11% | -14.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 36.97% | -14.09% |
EWO vs. SGDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SGDM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWO vs. SGDM - Dividend Comparison
EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than SGDM's 1.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 2.01% | 2.38% | 7.40% | 5.66% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% |
SGDM Sprott Gold Miners ETF | 1.09% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 0.30% | 0.25% | 0.50% | 0.58% | 0.02% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWO and SGDM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDM has higher volatility (16.53%) compared to EWO (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs SGDM's -54.95%.
On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 15.10% vs 11.84% for SGDM. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 11.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDM.
EWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 1.09% for SGDM.
EWO is categorized as Europe Equities, while SGDM is Materials. EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while SGDM tracks Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.50% for SGDM.
EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWO and SGDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer