EWO vs. MOOD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment. EWO is passively managed, while MOOD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, EWO returned 33.19%/yr vs 20.20%/yr for MOOD. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for MOOD.

Performance

EWO vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than MOOD's 14.12% return.

EWO

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 6.75%
• YTD: 18.55%
• 6M: 23.71%
• 1Y: 48.35%
• 3Y*: 33.19%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: 15.10%

MOOD

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 14.12%
• 6M: 15.59%
• 1Y: 34.43%
• 3Y*: 20.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWO vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF	18.55%	74.21%	4.05%	20.63%	0.23%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	14.12%	30.39%	12.53%	12.56%	-3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EWO and MOOD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022	0.65

The correlation between EWO and MOOD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWO vs. MOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWO	MOOD
Financial Services	46.5%	15.7%
Industrials	14.3%	12.6%
Basic Materials	10.5%	4.4%
Energy	9.5%	3.7%
Utilities	6.4%	2.7%
Technology	5.6%	27.6%
Real Estate	4.0%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	9.5%
Communication Services	-	7.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.1%
Healthcare	-	8.4%

Return for Risk

EWO vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWO

EWO Risk / Return Rank: 79
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MOOD

MOOD Risk / Return Rank: 77
MOOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MOOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
MOOD Omega Ratio Rank: 86
MOOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
MOOD Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWO vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWO	MOOD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	2.32	+0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	2.76	+0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	3.46	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.10	10.68	+0.42

EWO vs. MOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the MOOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWO and MOOD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWO vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and MOOD.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWO	MOOD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.69%	-14.34%	-61.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	-9.71%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.75%	-9.71%	-7.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.86%	+0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.10%	-2.32%	-25.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	3.14%	+1.02%

Volatility

EWO vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 4.19%. This indicates that EWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWO	MOOD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	4.19%	+3.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	12.73%	+3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.19%	14.49%	+4.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.95%	12.13%	+9.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.88%	12.13%	+10.75%

EWO vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than MOOD's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWO vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison

EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, more than MOOD's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF	2.01%	2.38%	7.40%	5.66%	4.75%	2.42%	0.98%	3.11%	4.04%	2.03%	1.99%	1.51%
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF	0.35%	0.40%	1.33%	1.34%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWO and MOOD in my portfolio?

EWO and MOOD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWO or MOOD?

EWO has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to MOOD (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs MOOD's -14.34%.

Which ETF is better, EWO or MOOD?

On 3-year performance, EWO leads with 33.19% vs 20.20% for MOOD. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 4.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWO or MOOD?

Over the 3-year period, EWO has performed better with a 33.19% return vs 20.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWO or MOOD?

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for MOOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWO or MOOD?

EWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.35% for MOOD.

What is the main difference between EWO and MOOD?

EWO is categorized as Europe Equities, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.68% for MOOD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.