EWO vs. FXI
EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while FXI is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWO returned 15.10%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for FXI. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
EWO vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -7.83% return. Over the past 10 years, EWO has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 15.10%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 3.13% annualized return.
EWO
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 6.33%
- YTD
- 18.55%
- 6M
- 23.71%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 33.19%
- 5Y*
- 15.56%
- 10Y*
- 15.10%
FXI
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -7.83%
- 6M
- -8.72%
- 1Y
- -2.91%
- 3Y*
- 10.41%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
EWO vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 18.55% | 74.21% | 4.05% | 20.63% | -21.95% | 31.50% | -3.67% | 17.05% | -22.88% | 52.47% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -7.83% | 28.95% | 28.98% | -12.42% | -20.66% | -20.06% | 8.92% | 14.90% | -13.28% | 36.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWO and FXI is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2004 | 0.52 |
The correlation between EWO and FXI shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWO vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWO
FXI
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
EWO
FXI
Industrials
EWO
FXI
Basic Materials
EWO
FXI
Energy
EWO
FXI
Utilities
EWO
FXI
Technology
EWO
FXI
Real Estate
EWO
FXI
Consumer Cyclical
EWO
FXI
Communication Services
EWO
-
FXI
Consumer Defensive
EWO
-
FXI
Healthcare
EWO
-
FXI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWO vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
EWO
FXI
EWO vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWO | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 0.99 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | -0.18 | +3.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | -0.38 | +11.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWO vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWO | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.69% | -72.68% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.08% | -16.03% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.75% | -28.72% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.82% | -54.94% | +13.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.10% | -60.81% | +2.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -27.42% | +27.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.10% | -31.21% | +3.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.16% | 7.66% | -3.50% |
Volatility
EWO vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) has a higher volatility of 7.31% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 6.22%. This indicates that EWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWO | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.31% | 6.22% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.88% | 14.30% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.19% | 19.90% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 31.67% | -9.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.88% | 27.64% | -4.76% |
EWO vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWO vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than FXI's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF | 2.01% | 2.38% | 7.40% | 5.66% | 4.75% | 2.42% | 0.98% | 3.11% | 4.04% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.51% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.62% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWO and FXI have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWO has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to FXI (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs FXI's -72.68%.
On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 15.10% vs 3.13% for FXI. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 6.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
FXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.01% for EWO.
EWO is categorized as Europe Equities, while FXI is China Equities. EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.74% for FXI.
EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWO and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer