EWO vs. CQQQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EWO (iShares MSCI Austria ETF) and CQQQ (Invesco China Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while CQQQ is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWO returned 15.10%/yr vs 5.36%/yr for CQQQ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for CQQQ.

Performance

EWO vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWO achieves a 18.55% return, which is significantly higher than CQQQ's -1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EWO has outperformed CQQQ with an annualized return of 15.10%, while CQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 5.36% annualized return.

EWO

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: 6.33%
• YTD: 18.55%
• 6M: 23.71%
• 1Y: 46.00%
• 3Y*: 33.19%
• 5Y*: 15.56%
• 10Y*: 15.10%

CQQQ

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: -8.85%
• YTD: -1.35%
• 6M: -0.24%
• 1Y: 21.23%
• 3Y*: 8.01%
• 5Y*: -8.12%
• 10Y*: 5.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWO vs. CQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF	18.55%	74.21%	4.05%	20.63%	-21.95%	31.50%	-3.67%	17.05%	-22.88%	52.47%
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	-1.35%	34.96%	9.84%	-16.71%	-30.09%	-24.54%	57.33%	33.57%	-34.77%	74.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EWO and CQQQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2009	0.47

EWO vs. CQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWO	CQQQ
Financial Services	46.5%	0.1%
Industrials	14.3%	1.3%
Basic Materials	10.5%	0.1%
Energy	9.5%	-
Utilities	6.4%	-
Technology	5.6%	58.2%
Real Estate	4.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.7%	13.8%
Communication Services	-	21.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-

Return for Risk

EWO vs. CQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWO

EWO Risk / Return Rank: 79
EWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
EWO Omega Ratio Rank: 79
EWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EWO Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CQQQ

CQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
CQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
CQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
CQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWO vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWO	CQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	0.71	+1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.35	1.18	+2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.14	+0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.28	0.87	+2.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.10	2.01	+9.09

EWO vs. CQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWO and CQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWO vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWO drawdown since its inception was -75.69%, roughly equal to the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWO and CQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWO	CQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.69%	-73.99%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.08%	-24.41%	+10.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.75%	-35.93%	+19.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.82%	-66.96%	+25.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.10%	-73.99%	+15.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-51.07%	+51.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.10%	-28.32%	+0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.16%	10.60%	-6.44%

Volatility

EWO vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Austria ETF (EWO) is 7.31%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that EWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWO	CQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.31%	10.63%	-3.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.88%	22.55%	-6.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.19%	30.20%	-11.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.95%	38.09%	-16.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.88%	33.33%	-10.45%

EWO vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWO vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

EWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than CQQQ's 2.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF	2.20%	2.17%	0.28%	0.55%	0.08%	0.00%	0.47%	0.01%	0.43%	1.41%	1.69%	1.77%
EWO iShares MSCI Austria ETF	2.01%	2.38%	7.40%	5.66%	4.75%	2.42%	0.98%	3.11%	4.04%	2.03%	1.99%	1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWO and CQQQ in my portfolio?

EWO and CQQQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWO or CQQQ?

CQQQ has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to EWO (7.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWO dropped -75.69% vs CQQQ's -73.99%.

Which ETF is better, EWO or CQQQ?

On 10-year performance, EWO leads with 15.10% vs 5.36% for CQQQ. On fees, EWO is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWO or CQQQ?

Over the 10-year period, EWO has performed better with a 15.10% return vs 5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWO or CQQQ?

EWO is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for CQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWO or CQQQ?

CQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 2.01% for EWO.

What is the main difference between EWO and CQQQ?

EWO is categorized as Europe Equities, while CQQQ is China Equities. EWO tracks MSCI Austria Investable Market Index, while CQQQ tracks FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWO and 0.70% for CQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.