PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWN vs. EWU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWN vs. EWU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than EWU's 5.10% return. Over the past 10 years, EWN has outperformed EWU with an annualized return of 14.24%, while EWU has yielded a comparatively lower 8.63% annualized return.


EWN

1D
-3.91%
1M
2.60%
YTD
20.24%
6M
20.65%
1Y
34.25%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
9.47%
10Y*
14.24%

EWU

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
5.10%
6M
5.10%
1Y
20.29%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.80%
10Y*
8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWN vs. EWU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
20.24%34.87%1.67%22.08%-24.43%22.74%23.23%32.45%-15.37%33.73%
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
5.10%34.95%6.74%12.40%-4.39%18.19%-11.80%21.29%-14.30%21.54%

Correlation

The correlation between EWN and EWU is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996

0.70

The correlation between EWN and EWU shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWN vs. EWU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWN
EWU

Technology

34.6%
0.7%

Financial Services

17.9%
25.7%

Industrials

11.4%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
13.1%

Communication Services

9.6%
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
3.8%

Basic Materials

5.1%
9.5%

Healthcare

2.5%
14.5%

Energy

2.0%
11.6%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.6%

Utilities

-

5.1%

Technology

EWN
34.6%
EWU
0.7%

Financial Services

EWN
17.9%
EWU
25.7%

Industrials

EWN
11.4%
EWU
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

EWN
10.1%
EWU
13.1%

Communication Services

EWN
9.6%
EWU
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWN
5.9%
EWU
3.8%

Basic Materials

EWN
5.1%
EWU
9.5%

Healthcare

EWN
2.5%
EWU
14.5%

Energy

EWN
2.0%
EWU
11.6%

Real Estate

EWN
0.7%
EWU
0.6%

Utilities

EWN

-

EWU
5.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWN vs. EWU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWN
EWN Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
EWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWN Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
EWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWN Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

EWU
EWU Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
EWU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWU Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EWU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWU Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWN vs. EWU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWNEWUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.05

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.83

7.03

+2.80

EWN vs. EWU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWN Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the EWU Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWN and EWU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWN vs. EWU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, roughly equal to the maximum EWU drawdown of -63.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and EWU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWNEWUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.22%

-63.99%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.24%

-9.92%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.77%

-12.63%

-7.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.57%

-24.91%

-18.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.57%

-43.33%

-0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.14%

-5.05%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.32%

-14.15%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

2.89%

+0.60%

Volatility

EWN vs. EWU - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF (EWU) at 4.04%. This indicates that EWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWNEWUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.69%

4.04%

+4.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.07%

12.59%

+5.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.06%

14.69%

+6.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.14%

16.43%

+6.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.23%

18.36%

+2.87%

EWN vs. EWU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWN and EWU have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

EWN vs. EWU - Dividend Comparison

EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than EWU's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWN
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF
4.18%5.03%2.18%1.79%1.98%1.01%0.78%2.57%2.40%1.68%2.71%1.92%
EWU
iShares MSCI United Kingdom ETF
3.28%3.73%4.16%4.14%3.43%4.35%2.48%4.13%4.98%3.91%3.97%4.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWN and EWU have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWN has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to EWU (4.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWN dropped -65.22% vs EWU's -63.99%.

On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 14.24% vs 8.63% for EWU. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, EWU has been the lower-risk option at 4.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 8.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWN and EWU have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 3.28% for EWU.

EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index, while EWU tracks MSCI United Kingdom Index.

EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWN and EWU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer