EWN vs. EUDV
EWN (iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF) and EUDV (ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - EWN tracks the MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index while EUDV tracks the MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWN returned 14.24%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for EUDV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EUDV.
Performance
EWN vs. EUDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWN achieves a 20.24% return, which is significantly higher than EUDV's 0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, EWN has outperformed EUDV with an annualized return of 14.24%, while EUDV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.53% annualized return.
EWN
- 1D
- -3.91%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 20.24%
- 6M
- 20.65%
- 1Y
- 34.25%
- 3Y*
- 21.10%
- 5Y*
- 9.47%
- 10Y*
- 14.24%
EUDV
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -2.70%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- -1.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.81%
- 10Y*
- 5.53%
EWN vs. EUDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF | 20.24% | 34.87% | 1.67% | 22.08% | -24.43% | 22.74% | 23.23% | 32.45% | -15.37% | 33.73% |
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 0.21% | 14.05% | 0.03% | 20.41% | -24.87% | 19.56% | 5.81% | 25.89% | -11.12% | 21.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWN and EUDV is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between EWN and EUDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWN vs. EUDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWN
EUDV
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Technology
EWN
EUDV
Financial Services
EWN
EUDV
Industrials
EWN
EUDV
Consumer Defensive
EWN
EUDV
Communication Services
EWN
EUDV
Consumer Cyclical
EWN
EUDV
-
Basic Materials
EWN
EUDV
Healthcare
EWN
EUDV
Energy
EWN
EUDV
Real Estate
EWN
EUDV
Utilities
EWN
-
EUDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWN vs. EUDV — Risk / Return Rank
EWN
EUDV
EWN vs. EUDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) and ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWN | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.00 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | -0.12 | +2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.83 | -0.31 | +10.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWN vs. EUDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWN drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, which is greater than EUDV's maximum drawdown of -37.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWN and EUDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWN | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.22% | -37.51% | -27.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.24% | -10.63% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.77% | -13.69% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.57% | -37.51% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.57% | -37.51% | -6.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -5.62% | +1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.32% | -8.58% | -7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.49% | 3.97% | -0.48% |
Volatility
EWN vs. EUDV - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF (EWN) has a higher volatility of 8.69% compared to ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF (EUDV) at 3.91%. This indicates that EWN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWN | EUDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.69% | 3.91% | +4.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.07% | 11.49% | +6.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.06% | 14.19% | +6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.14% | 16.18% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 17.17% | +4.06% |
EWN vs. EUDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EUDV's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWN vs. EUDV - Dividend Comparison
EWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than EUDV's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUDV ProShares MSCI Europe Dividend Growers ETF | 1.73% | 1.74% | 1.92% | 1.87% | 1.77% | 2.30% | 1.27% | 2.20% | 2.22% | 2.33% | 2.53% | 0.37% |
EWN iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF | 4.18% | 5.03% | 2.18% | 1.79% | 1.98% | 1.01% | 0.78% | 2.57% | 2.40% | 1.68% | 2.71% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWN and EUDV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWN has higher volatility (8.69%) compared to EUDV (3.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWN dropped -65.22% vs EUDV's -37.51%.
On 10-year performance, EWN leads with 14.24% vs 5.53% for EUDV. On fees, EWN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EUDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWN has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 5.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EUDV.
EWN has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 1.73% for EUDV.
EWN tracks MSCI Netherlands Investable Market Index, while EUDV tracks MSCI Europe Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWN and 0.55% for EUDV.
EWN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWN and EUDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer