PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMC vs. TNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMC vs. TNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than TNA's 56.90% return. Over the past 10 years, EWMC has outperformed TNA with an annualized return of 11.23%, while TNA has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.


EWMC

1D
0.27%
1M
0.27%
YTD
6.14%
6M
4.64%
1Y
19.85%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*
11.23%

TNA

1D
-3.11%
1M
9.59%
YTD
56.90%
6M
45.88%
1Y
125.39%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
-5.98%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. TNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
6.14%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
56.90%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and TNA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2010

0.90

The correlation between EWMC and TNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWMC vs. TNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWMC
TNA

Industrials

17.9%
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
8.0%

Financial Services

13.8%
15.3%

Technology

13.3%
19.1%

Healthcare

9.8%
16.3%

Real Estate

7.8%
5.9%

Basic Materials

5.9%
4.7%

Energy

5.1%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
2.3%

Utilities

3.4%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.4%

Industrials

EWMC
17.9%
TNA
18.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EWMC
16.0%
TNA
8.0%

Financial Services

EWMC
13.8%
TNA
15.3%

Technology

EWMC
13.3%
TNA
19.1%

Healthcare

EWMC
9.8%
TNA
16.3%

Real Estate

EWMC
7.8%
TNA
5.9%

Basic Materials

EWMC
5.9%
TNA
4.7%

Energy

EWMC
5.1%
TNA
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWMC
5.0%
TNA
2.3%

Utilities

EWMC
3.4%
TNA
2.7%

Communication Services

EWMC
2.0%
TNA
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMC vs. TNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC
EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. TNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWMCTNADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.31

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.88

-1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

12.72

-5.06

EWMC vs. TNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the TNA Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and TNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. TNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum TNA drawdown of -88.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and TNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCTNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-88.09%

+44.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-32.53%

+24.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-65.78%

+37.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-82.36%

+54.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-88.09%

+44.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.49%

-33.64%

+31.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-33.92%

+28.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

9.89%

-7.29%

Volatility

EWMC vs. TNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) is 3.73%, while Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a volatility of 19.82%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCTNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.73%

19.82%

-16.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

42.69%

-32.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

58.76%

-42.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

67.57%

-46.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.22%

68.50%

-46.28%

EWMC vs. TNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TNA's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWMC vs. TNA - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than TNA's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
0.75%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.38%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMC and TNA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TNA has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to EWMC (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs TNA's -88.09%.

On 10-year performance, EWMC leads with 11.23% vs 9.70% for TNA. On fees, EWMC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWMC has performed better with a 11.23% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWMC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TNA.

EWMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.

EWMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while TNA is Leveraged Equities. EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 1.05% for TNA.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMC and TNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer