EWMC vs. SMMV
EWMC (Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - EWMC tracks the S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index while SMMV tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWMC returned 9.29%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for SMMV. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. EWMC charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.
Performance
EWMC vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 13.17% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 9.33% return.
EWMC
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 11.71%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 21.04%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.48%
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.43M | $1.18M | $1.33M | |
| $337.38K | $347.17K | $431.55K |
EWMC vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF | 13.17% | 7.81% | 15.67% | 18.79% | -11.63% | 26.35% | 15.60% | 23.05% | -12.45% | 13.05% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 9.33% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | -2.88% | 24.21% | 1.15% | 14.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWMC and SMMV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2016 | 0.83 |
The correlation between EWMC and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EWMC vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWMC
SMMV
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
EWMC
SMMV
Consumer Cyclical
EWMC
SMMV
Financial Services
EWMC
SMMV
Technology
EWMC
SMMV
Healthcare
EWMC
SMMV
Real Estate
EWMC
SMMV
Basic Materials
EWMC
SMMV
Energy
EWMC
SMMV
Consumer Defensive
EWMC
SMMV
Utilities
EWMC
SMMV
Communication Services
EWMC
SMMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWMC vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank
EWMC
SMMV
EWMC vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EWMC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.19 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 6.75 | +0.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EWMC vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than SMMV's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and SMMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWMC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -38.77% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.62% | -7.02% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.09% | -13.68% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -18.00% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -1.07% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -5.04% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 2.28% | +0.28% |
Volatility
EWMC vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.85%. This indicates that EWMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWMC | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 2.85% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.51% | 6.98% | +3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 9.75% | +5.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.80% | 13.44% | +7.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 15.62% | +6.57% |
EWMC vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWMC vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than SMMV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWMC Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF | 0.70% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.25% | 1.50% | 1.14% | 1.00% | 1.43% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWMC and SMMV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWMC has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to SMMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs SMMV's -38.77%.
On 5-year performance, EWMC leads with 9.29% vs 6.29% for SMMV. On fees, SMMV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EWMC has performed better with a 9.29% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SMMV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EWMC.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.70% for EWMC.
EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.20% for SMMV.
SMMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWMC and SMMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer