PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMC vs. DES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMC vs. DES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than DES's 15.19% return. Over the past 10 years, EWMC has outperformed DES with an annualized return of 10.99%, while DES has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.


EWMC

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.30%
YTD
7.11%
6M
6.51%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.99%

DES

1D
-1.24%
1M
0.67%
YTD
15.19%
6M
14.26%
1Y
25.57%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. DES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
7.11%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
15.19%0.25%9.93%16.50%-10.96%26.51%-4.26%20.26%-12.85%8.64%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and DES is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2010

0.89

The correlation between EWMC and DES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWMC vs. DES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWMC
DES

Industrials

17.9%
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
14.8%

Financial Services

13.8%
23.7%

Technology

13.3%
5.5%

Healthcare

9.8%
1.7%

Real Estate

7.8%
9.6%

Basic Materials

5.9%
6.0%

Energy

5.1%
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.3%

Utilities

3.4%
4.6%

Communication Services

2.0%
2.8%

Industrials

EWMC
17.9%
DES
13.3%

Consumer Cyclical

EWMC
16.0%
DES
14.8%

Financial Services

EWMC
13.8%
DES
23.7%

Technology

EWMC
13.3%
DES
5.5%

Healthcare

EWMC
9.8%
DES
1.7%

Real Estate

EWMC
7.8%
DES
9.6%

Basic Materials

EWMC
5.9%
DES
6.0%

Energy

EWMC
5.1%
DES
10.7%

Consumer Defensive

EWMC
5.0%
DES
4.3%

Utilities

EWMC
3.4%
DES
4.6%

Communication Services

EWMC
2.0%
DES
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMC vs. DES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC
EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DES
DES Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DES Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
DES Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DES Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DES Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. DES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWMCDESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.28

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

3.36

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.54

9.57

-1.03

EWMC vs. DES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the DES Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and DES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWMCDESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.57

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.31

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.37

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.31

+0.23

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. DES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum DES drawdown of -65.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and DES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCDESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-65.48%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-7.64%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-25.16%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-25.16%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-45.65%

+2.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-1.52%

+1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-9.68%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.68%

-0.11%

Volatility

EWMC vs. DES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) is 3.82%, while WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund (DES) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that EWMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCDESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

4.19%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

11.02%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

16.46%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

19.57%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

21.97%

+0.28%

EWMC vs. DES - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWMC has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DES's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWMC vs. DES - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than DES's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DES
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Dividend Fund
2.40%2.85%2.81%2.65%2.89%2.31%2.75%2.68%3.65%2.89%2.70%3.09%
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
0.96%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMC and DES have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DES has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to EWMC (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs DES's -65.48%.

On 10-year performance, EWMC leads with 10.99% vs 8.04% for DES. On fees, EWMC is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EWMC has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWMC has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWMC is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for DES.

DES has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.96% for EWMC.

EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while DES tracks WisdomTree SmallCap Dividend (TR). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EWMC and 0.38% for DES.

DES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.56 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMC and DES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer