PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWMC vs. CSB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWMC vs. CSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWMC achieves a 7.11% return, which is significantly lower than CSB's 8.30% return. Over the past 10 years, EWMC has outperformed CSB with an annualized return of 10.99%, while CSB has yielded a comparatively lower 9.58% annualized return.


EWMC

1D
-0.11%
1M
2.30%
YTD
7.11%
6M
6.51%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
7.66%
10Y*
10.99%

CSB

1D
-1.09%
1M
-1.58%
YTD
8.30%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.95%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
9.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWMC vs. CSB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
7.11%7.81%15.67%18.79%-11.63%26.35%15.60%23.05%-12.45%13.05%
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
8.30%2.26%9.64%12.60%-13.11%27.04%11.30%21.12%-7.10%11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between EWMC and CSB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2015

0.84

The correlation between EWMC and CSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

EWMC vs. CSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWMC
CSB

Industrials

17.9%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
19.0%

Financial Services

13.8%
26.5%

Technology

13.3%
1.2%

Healthcare

9.8%
0.4%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Basic Materials

5.9%
3.4%

Energy

5.1%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.4%

Utilities

3.4%
22.0%

Communication Services

2.0%
3.6%

Industrials

EWMC
17.9%
CSB
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

EWMC
16.0%
CSB
19.0%

Financial Services

EWMC
13.8%
CSB
26.5%

Technology

EWMC
13.3%
CSB
1.2%

Healthcare

EWMC
9.8%
CSB
0.4%

Real Estate

EWMC
7.8%
CSB

-

Basic Materials

EWMC
5.9%
CSB
3.4%

Energy

EWMC
5.1%
CSB
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

EWMC
5.0%
CSB
4.4%

Utilities

EWMC
3.4%
CSB
22.0%

Communication Services

EWMC
2.0%
CSB
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWMC vs. CSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWMC
EWMC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
EWMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
EWMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWMC Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

CSB
CSB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
CSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSB Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSB Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWMC vs. CSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) and VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EWMCCSBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

1.25

+0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

1.92

+0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.51

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.54

7.26

+1.28

EWMC vs. CSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the CSB Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWMC and CSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EWMCCSBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.25

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.20

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.45

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.45

+0.10

Drawdowns

EWMC vs. CSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWMC drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, roughly equal to the maximum CSB drawdown of -42.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWMC and CSB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWMCCSBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-42.07%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

-7.18%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.09%

-21.82%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.09%

-24.49%

-3.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.12%

-42.07%

-1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-3.12%

+3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-7.14%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

2.48%

+0.09%

Volatility

EWMC vs. CSB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (EWMC) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CSB) at 3.59%. This indicates that EWMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWMCCSBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

3.59%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

9.19%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.13%

14.54%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

18.78%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

21.31%

+0.94%

EWMC vs. CSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EWMC and CSB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

EWMC vs. CSB - Dividend Comparison

EWMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than CSB's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSB
VictoryShares US Small Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.26%3.54%3.12%3.45%3.60%3.11%3.70%3.19%3.45%3.19%2.85%1.57%
EWMC
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF
0.96%1.19%0.95%0.96%1.28%0.92%1.16%1.25%1.50%1.14%1.00%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWMC and CSB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWMC has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to CSB (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWMC dropped -43.12% vs CSB's -42.07%.

On 10-year performance, EWMC leads with 10.99% vs 9.58% for CSB. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, CSB has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWMC has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 9.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWMC and CSB have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

CSB has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.96% for EWMC.

EWMC tracks S&P MidCap 400 GARP Index, while CSB tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Small Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Crestview.

EWMC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWMC and CSB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer