EWM vs. GDX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) and GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Malaysia Index, while GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWM returned 2.79%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for GDX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWM charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for GDX.

Performance

EWM vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWM achieves a 2.89% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.69% return. Over the past 10 years, EWM has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 2.79%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.29% annualized return.

EWM

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: -6.82%
• YTD: 2.89%
• 6M: 6.00%
• 1Y: 19.03%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: 4.69%
• 10Y*: 2.79%

GDX

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: -16.83%
• YTD: -6.69%
• 6M: -5.89%
• 1Y: 50.59%
• 3Y*: 38.96%
• 5Y*: 17.51%
• 10Y*: 13.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWM vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF	2.89%	15.74%	19.46%	-3.61%	-6.00%	-7.40%	3.12%	-1.41%	-6.28%	24.25%
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF	-6.69%	154.77%	10.63%	9.98%	-9.01%	-9.52%	23.66%	39.84%	-8.77%	11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between EWM and GDX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006	0.29

EWM vs. GDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWM	GDX
Financial Services	46.6%	-
Industrials	11.1%	-
Utilities	10.8%	-
Basic Materials	8.9%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	-
Communication Services	6.6%	-
Energy	3.9%	-
Healthcare	3.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.1%	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

EWM vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWM

EWM Risk / Return Rank: 44
EWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
EWM Omega Ratio Rank: 41
EWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
EWM Martin Ratio Rank: 46

GDX

GDX Risk / Return Rank: 33
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWM vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EWM	GDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.09	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.51	+0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.21	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.40	+0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	3.87	+2.78

EWM vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWM and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EWM vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWM drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWM and GDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWM	GDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.19%	-80.34%	-8.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.14%	-36.28%	+27.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.31%	-36.28%	+14.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.76%	-46.51%	+23.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.81%	-49.79%	+5.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.08%	-30.91%	+21.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.80%	-40.41%	+8.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	13.11%	-10.24%

Volatility

EWM vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) is 3.97%, while VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 17.20%. This indicates that EWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWM	GDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.97%	17.20%	-13.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.95%	39.15%	-28.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.10%	46.89%	-32.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.72%	36.74%	-23.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.27%	37.34%	-21.07%

EWM vs. GDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GDX's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWM vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

EWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, more than GDX's 0.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF	3.32%	3.41%	3.32%	3.47%	3.00%	6.48%	1.89%	2.91%	3.84%	5.58%	5.97%	37.54%
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF	0.79%	0.74%	1.19%	1.61%	1.66%	1.67%	0.53%	0.67%	0.50%	0.76%	0.26%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWM and GDX in my portfolio?

EWM and GDX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWM or GDX?

GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to EWM (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWM dropped -89.19% vs GDX's -80.34%.

Which ETF is better, EWM or GDX?

On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 13.29% vs 2.79% for EWM. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWM or GDX?

Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 13.29% return vs 2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWM or GDX?

EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWM or GDX?

EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.79% for GDX.

What is the main difference between EWM and GDX?

EWM is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while GDX is Gold. EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index, while GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWM and 0.51% for GDX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.