PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWK vs. NORW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWK vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Belgium ETF (EWK) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWK achieves a 12.08% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 24.70% return. Over the past 10 years, EWK has underperformed NORW with an annualized return of 6.90%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.


EWK

1D
1.05%
1M
-1.25%
6M
2.98%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
15.65%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
6.90%
ALL TIME*
6.08%

NORW

1D
-0.06%
1M
8.26%
6M
13.70%
YTD
24.70%
1Y
32.55%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
10.03%
ALL TIME*
8.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$968.64K$832.94K$1.32M
$1.53M$1.47M$2.79M

EWK vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWK
iShares MSCI Belgium ETF
12.08%35.38%0.14%7.47%-13.98%12.84%0.04%25.92%-20.40%23.70%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
24.70%32.59%-2.50%5.03%-12.55%13.65%26.00%14.39%-10.39%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EWK and NORW is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2009

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between EWK and NORW has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWK vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWK
NORW

Healthcare

28.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

25.2%
11.7%

Financial Services

15.9%
23.8%

Real Estate

9.7%
0.4%

Industrials

7.4%
14.8%

Basic Materials

4.8%
9.5%

Utilities

2.7%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.8%
0.6%

Technology

1.6%
3.7%

Communication Services

1.3%
6.5%

Energy

1.1%
28.3%

Healthcare

EWK
28.5%
NORW

-

Consumer Defensive

EWK
25.2%
NORW
11.7%

Financial Services

EWK
15.9%
NORW
23.8%

Real Estate

EWK
9.7%
NORW
0.4%

Industrials

EWK
7.4%
NORW
14.8%

Basic Materials

EWK
4.8%
NORW
9.5%

Utilities

EWK
2.7%
NORW
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

EWK
1.8%
NORW
0.6%

Technology

EWK
1.6%
NORW
3.7%

Communication Services

EWK
1.3%
NORW
6.5%

Energy

EWK
1.1%
NORW
28.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWK vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWK
EWK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EWK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWK Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
EWK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWK Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

NORW
NORW Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWK vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Belgium ETF (EWK) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWKNORWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.26

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.53

7.03

-1.49

EWK vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWK Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWK and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWK vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWK drawdown since its inception was -74.10%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWK and NORW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWKNORWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.10%

-35.62%

-38.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.47%

-14.49%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.47%

-16.06%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.24%

-32.78%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.80%

-33.86%

-8.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-4.77%

+3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.43%

-10.11%

-11.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.37%

4.64%

-0.27%

Volatility

EWK vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Belgium ETF (EWK) is 3.31%, while Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) has a volatility of 4.79%. This indicates that EWK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWKNORWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

4.79%

-1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.30%

14.00%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.56%

17.34%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.88%

22.01%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.79%

20.56%

-1.77%

EWK vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWK has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWK vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

EWK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than NORW's 7.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWK
iShares MSCI Belgium ETF
1.83%1.73%3.25%2.09%2.58%3.64%1.66%2.77%2.78%2.91%1.75%2.06%
NORW
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
7.22%3.44%6.02%5.27%4.01%1.51%1.13%2.47%3.53%3.64%3.79%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWK and NORW have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NORW has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to EWK (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWK dropped -74.10% vs NORW's -35.62%.

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 10.03% vs 6.90% for EWK. On fees, EWK is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWK has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWK is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for NORW.

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 7.22%, compared with 1.83% for EWK.

EWK tracks MSCI Belgium Investable Market Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWK and 0.50% for NORW.

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWK and NORW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer