EWJV vs. EZJ
EWJV (iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF) and EZJ (ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJV is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Value Index, while EZJ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWJV returned 13.51%/yr vs 7.67%/yr for EZJ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EWJV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for EZJ.
Performance
EWJV vs. EZJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWJV achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly lower than EZJ's 28.79% return.
EWJV
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- —
EZJ
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 12.78%
- YTD
- 28.79%
- 6M
- 31.91%
- 1Y
- 58.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.86%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
EWJV vs. EZJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF | 14.97% | 33.96% | 11.59% | 23.60% | -6.02% | 5.48% | 2.41% | 10.48% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 28.79% | 42.72% | 3.31% | 30.78% | -38.23% | -1.96% | 22.21% | 22.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJV and EZJ is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.86 |
The correlation between EWJV and EZJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWJV vs. EZJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJV
EZJ
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
EWJV
EZJ
Industrials
EWJV
EZJ
Consumer Cyclical
EWJV
EZJ
Technology
EWJV
EZJ
Communication Services
EWJV
EZJ
Healthcare
EWJV
EZJ
Consumer Defensive
EWJV
EZJ
Real Estate
EWJV
EZJ
Energy
EWJV
EZJ
Basic Materials
EWJV
EZJ
Utilities
EWJV
EZJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJV vs. EZJ — Risk / Return Rank
EWJV
EZJ
EWJV vs. EZJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJV | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.27 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 2.19 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | 6.72 | +0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJV | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.48 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.21 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.23 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
EWJV vs. EZJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJV drawdown since its inception was -30.05%, smaller than the maximum EZJ drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJV and EZJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJV | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.05% | -58.63% | +28.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.74% | -26.78% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.74% | -31.48% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -58.63% | +33.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -4.25% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -21.29% | +15.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 8.72% | -3.87% |
Volatility
EWJV vs. EZJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) is 3.96%, while ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan (EZJ) has a volatility of 8.67%. This indicates that EWJV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJV | EZJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 8.67% | -4.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 30.75% | -16.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.22% | 39.75% | -20.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 36.59% | -18.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 34.54% | -16.01% |
EWJV vs. EZJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWJV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EZJ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWJV vs. EZJ - Dividend Comparison
EWJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than EZJ's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF | 4.66% | 5.35% | 4.10% | 3.32% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 1.96% | 4.29% | 0.00% |
EZJ ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan | 1.60% | 1.13% | 2.09% | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, EWJV and EZJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EZJ has higher volatility (8.67%) compared to EWJV (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJV dropped -30.05% vs EZJ's -58.63%.
On 5-year performance, EWJV leads with 13.51% vs 7.67% for EZJ. On fees, EWJV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EWJV has been the lower-risk option at 3.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EWJV has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWJV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for EZJ.
EWJV has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 1.60% for EZJ.
EWJV is categorized as Japan Equities, while EZJ is Leveraged Equities. EWJV tracks MSCI Japan Value Index, while EZJ tracks MSCI Japan Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EWJV and 0.95% for EZJ.
EWJV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJV and EZJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer