EWJV vs. ACWI
EWJV (iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJV is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Value Index, while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWJV returned 13.51%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for ACWI. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWJV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
EWJV vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWJV achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly higher than ACWI's 12.13% return.
EWJV
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 6.48%
- YTD
- 14.97%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 36.33%
- 3Y*
- 24.24%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
EWJV vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF | 14.97% | 33.96% | 11.59% | 23.60% | -6.02% | 5.48% | 2.41% | 10.48% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 16.34% | 15.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJV and ACWI is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EWJV and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWJV vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJV
ACWI
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Financial Services
EWJV
ACWI
Industrials
EWJV
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
EWJV
ACWI
Technology
EWJV
ACWI
Communication Services
EWJV
ACWI
Healthcare
EWJV
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
EWJV
ACWI
Real Estate
EWJV
ACWI
Energy
EWJV
ACWI
Basic Materials
EWJV
ACWI
Utilities
EWJV
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJV vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
EWJV
ACWI
EWJV vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 2.29 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.72 | 3.17 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.41 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 3.01 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.52 | 13.53 | -6.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 2.29 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.71 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.43 | +0.26 |
Drawdowns
EWJV vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJV drawdown since its inception was -30.05%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJV and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.05% | -56.00% | +25.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.74% | -9.73% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.74% | -16.55% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.39% | -26.42% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.99% | -0.83% | -3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.19% | -8.61% | +2.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.85% | 2.16% | +2.69% |
Volatility
EWJV vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF (EWJV) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) have volatilities of 3.96% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJV | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 3.93% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 10.29% | +4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.22% | 12.78% | +6.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 16.05% | +1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 17.11% | +1.42% |
EWJV vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWJV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWJV vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
EWJV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
EWJV iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF | 4.66% | 5.35% | 4.10% | 3.32% | 2.71% | 2.46% | 1.96% | 4.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWJV and ACWI have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWJV has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to ACWI (3.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJV dropped -30.05% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 5-year performance, EWJV leads with 13.51% vs 11.28% for ACWI. On fees, EWJV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EWJV has performed better with a 13.51% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWJV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
EWJV has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.
EWJV is categorized as Japan Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. EWJV tracks MSCI Japan Value Index, while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for EWJV and 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJV and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer