EWJ vs. SLV
EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWJ returned 9.28%/yr vs 15.63%/yr for SLV. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
EWJ vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWJ achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 3.97% return. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 9.28%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
SLV
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 3.97%
- 6M
- 29.40%
- 1Y
- 113.72%
- 3Y*
- 45.73%
- 5Y*
- 21.04%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
EWJ vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 16.58% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 3.97% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJ and SLV is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.23 |
EWJ vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJ
SLV
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Industrials
EWJ
SLV
-
Technology
EWJ
SLV
-
Financial Services
EWJ
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWJ
SLV
-
Communication Services
EWJ
SLV
-
Healthcare
EWJ
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
EWJ
SLV
-
Basic Materials
EWJ
SLV
Real Estate
EWJ
SLV
-
Utilities
EWJ
SLV
-
Energy
EWJ
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJ vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
EWJ
SLV
EWJ vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.69 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 5.76 | +2.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.94 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.58 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.49 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.25 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
EWJ vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.93% | -76.28% | +15.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -42.45% | +28.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -42.45% | +27.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.14% | -42.45% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.14% | -42.81% | +9.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -36.57% | +36.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.74% | -44.67% | +22.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 19.81% | -15.80% |
Volatility
EWJ vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) is 4.21%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.34%. This indicates that EWJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJ | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 16.34% | -12.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.02% | 58.31% | -43.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 58.90% | -39.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 36.15% | -17.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 31.83% | -14.56% |
EWJ vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWJ vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.88% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWJ and SLV have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.34%) compared to EWJ (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.63% vs 9.28% for EWJ. On fees, EWJ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.63% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWJ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
EWJ is categorized as Japan Equities, while SLV is Silver. EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWJ and 0.50% for SLV.
SLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJ and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer