EWJ vs. SCJ
EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) and SCJ (iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF) are both Japan Equities funds from iShares - EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index while SCJ tracks the MSCI Japan Small Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWJ returned 9.28%/yr vs 7.52%/yr for SCJ. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
EWJ vs. SCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWJ achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly higher than SCJ's 14.88% return. Over the past 10 years, EWJ has outperformed SCJ with an annualized return of 9.28%, while SCJ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.52% annualized return.
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 16.58%
- 6M
- 16.78%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 18.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.28%
SCJ
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 6M
- 16.33%
- 1Y
- 29.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.46%
- 10Y*
- 7.52%
EWJ vs. SCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 16.58% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 14.88% | 29.58% | 3.41% | 13.22% | -12.75% | -2.95% | 7.46% | 16.16% | -17.17% | 31.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJ and SCJ is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007 | 0.85 |
The correlation between EWJ and SCJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWJ vs. SCJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJ
SCJ
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
EWJ
SCJ
Technology
EWJ
SCJ
Financial Services
EWJ
SCJ
Consumer Cyclical
EWJ
SCJ
Communication Services
EWJ
SCJ
Healthcare
EWJ
SCJ
Consumer Defensive
EWJ
SCJ
Basic Materials
EWJ
SCJ
Real Estate
EWJ
SCJ
Utilities
EWJ
SCJ
Energy
EWJ
SCJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJ vs. SCJ — Risk / Return Rank
EWJ
SCJ
EWJ vs. SCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJ | SCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.47 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 8.35 | -0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJ | SCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.87 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.46 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.30 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
EWJ vs. SCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, which is greater than SCJ's maximum drawdown of -43.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and SCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJ | SCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.93% | -43.52% | -17.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -12.17% | -1.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -12.43% | -2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.14% | -33.25% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.14% | -38.87% | +5.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.36% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.74% | -10.38% | -11.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 3.59% | +0.42% |
Volatility
EWJ vs. SCJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF (SCJ) have volatilities of 4.21% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJ | SCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 4.03% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.02% | 13.11% | +1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 16.08% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 15.80% | +2.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 16.28% | +0.99% |
EWJ vs. SCJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWJ and SCJ have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
EWJ vs. SCJ - Dividend Comparison
EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, more than SCJ's 2.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.88% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
SCJ iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap ETF | 2.73% | 3.14% | 1.79% | 1.99% | 1.18% | 1.87% | 0.89% | 1.85% | 1.44% | 1.45% | 2.73% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWJ and SCJ have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWJ has higher volatility (4.21%) compared to SCJ (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs SCJ's -43.52%.
On 10-year performance, EWJ leads with 9.28% vs 7.52% for SCJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, SCJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWJ has performed better with a 9.28% return vs 7.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWJ and SCJ have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.88%, compared with 2.73% for SCJ.
EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while SCJ tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap Index.
SCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJ and SCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer