PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWY vs. FXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWY vs. FXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWY achieves a 61.59% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, EWY has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 13.13%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.81% annualized return.


EWY

1D
-2.55%
1M
-12.79%
6M
28.34%
YTD
61.59%
1Y
127.36%
3Y*
35.68%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
13.13%
ALL TIME*
9.64%

FXI

1D
-0.05%
1M
14.38%
6M
-7.16%
YTD
-3.96%
1Y
0.93%
3Y*
9.88%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
2.81%
ALL TIME*
5.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.45B$4.55B$4.16B
$773.89M$798.32M$975.73M

EWY vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
61.59%95.33%-20.48%19.05%-26.59%-7.58%39.43%7.97%-20.37%44.97%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-3.96%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%36.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EWY and FXI is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2004

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between EWY and FXI has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EWY vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWY
FXI

Technology

54.1%
5.9%

Industrials

15.7%
2.8%

Financial Services

11.4%
35.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
25.3%

Healthcare

3.6%
2.6%

Communication Services

2.9%
17.8%

Basic Materials

2.2%
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
0.8%

Energy

1.0%
4.8%

Utilities

0.4%
0.3%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

EWY
54.1%
FXI
5.9%

Industrials

EWY
15.7%
FXI
2.8%

Financial Services

EWY
11.4%
FXI
35.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EWY
5.9%
FXI
25.3%

Healthcare

EWY
3.6%
FXI
2.6%

Communication Services

EWY
2.9%
FXI
17.8%

Basic Materials

EWY
2.2%
FXI
3.4%

Consumer Defensive

EWY
2.2%
FXI
0.8%

Energy

EWY
1.0%
FXI
4.8%

Utilities

EWY
0.4%
FXI
0.3%

Real Estate

EWY

-

FXI
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWY vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EWY
EWY Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWY Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
EWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWY Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EWY vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWYFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.01

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

-0.03

+3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.67

-0.07

+12.74

EWY vs. FXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWY Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the FXI Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWY and FXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWY vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWY drawdown since its inception was -74.14%, roughly equal to the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWY and FXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWYFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.14%

-72.68%

-1.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.21%

-22.94%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.21%

-25.56%

-8.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.15%

-49.88%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.73%

-60.81%

+11.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.33%

-24.37%

-3.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-31.21%

+11.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.56%

10.00%

-0.44%

Volatility

EWY vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a higher volatility of 22.08% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.14%. This indicates that EWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWYFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.08%

5.14%

+16.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.88%

14.61%

+36.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.29%

20.32%

+33.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.77%

31.44%

+1.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.38%

27.60%

+1.78%

EWY vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWY has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWY vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison

EWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than FXI's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWY
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
1.30%2.10%2.55%2.52%1.23%2.16%0.73%2.10%1.34%2.90%1.21%2.42%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
1.86%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWY and FXI have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWY has higher volatility (22.08%) compared to FXI (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWY dropped -74.14% vs FXI's -72.68%.

On 10-year performance, EWY leads with 13.13% vs 2.81% for FXI. On fees, EWY is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWY has performed better with a 13.13% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWY is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

FXI has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.30% for EWY.

EWY is categorized as South Korea Equities, while FXI is China Equities. EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EWY and 0.74% for FXI.

EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWY and FXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer