EWJ vs. BBJP
EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) and BBJP (JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF) are both Japan Equities funds - EWJ tracks the MSCI Japan Index while BBJP tracks the Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EWJ returned 8.04%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for BBJP. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. EWJ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BBJP.
Performance
EWJ vs. BBJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EWJ having a 12.36% return and BBJP slightly lower at 11.77%.
EWJ
- 1D
- -3.62%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 12.44%
- 1Y
- 28.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
BBJP
- 1D
- -3.41%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 12.18%
- 1Y
- 28.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- —
EWJ vs. BBJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 12.36% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.03% |
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 11.77% | 26.55% | 7.47% | 20.65% | -17.24% | 1.21% | 15.42% | 18.85% | -13.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWJ and BBJP is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.99 |
The correlation between EWJ and BBJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWJ vs. BBJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWJ
BBJP
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Energy
Industrials
EWJ
BBJP
Technology
EWJ
BBJP
Financial Services
EWJ
BBJP
Consumer Cyclical
EWJ
BBJP
Communication Services
EWJ
BBJP
Healthcare
EWJ
BBJP
Consumer Defensive
EWJ
BBJP
Basic Materials
EWJ
BBJP
Real Estate
EWJ
BBJP
Utilities
EWJ
BBJP
Energy
EWJ
BBJP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWJ vs. BBJP — Risk / Return Rank
EWJ
BBJP
EWJ vs. BBJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 2.17 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 7.27 | +0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.45 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.42 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
EWJ vs. BBJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWJ drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, which is greater than BBJP's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWJ and BBJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.93% | -32.66% | -28.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -13.60% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.68% | -14.49% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.14% | -32.66% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.62% | -3.94% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.73% | -8.52% | -13.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 4.04% | -0.03% |
Volatility
EWJ vs. BBJP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) at 4.80%. This indicates that EWJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWJ | BBJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.80% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.50% | 15.40% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.84% | 19.71% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 18.21% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 18.32% | -1.01% |
EWJ vs. BBJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWJ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than BBJP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWJ vs. BBJP - Dividend Comparison
EWJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, less than BBJP's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBJP JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF | 4.80% | 5.37% | 2.80% | 3.05% | 1.52% | 2.89% | 1.12% | 2.31% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 4.03% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, EWJ and BBJP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EWJ has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to BBJP (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWJ dropped -60.93% vs BBJP's -32.66%.
On 5-year performance, BBJP leads with 8.24% vs 8.04% for EWJ. On fees, BBJP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, BBJP has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBJP has performed better with a 8.24% return vs 8.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBJP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.
BBJP has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.03% for EWJ.
EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index, while BBJP tracks Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWJ and 0.19% for BBJP.
BBJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWJ and BBJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer