EWG vs. EWJ
EWG (iShares MSCI Germany ETF) and EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWG is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Germany Index, while EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWG returned 7.59%/yr vs 9.37%/yr for EWJ. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
EWG vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWG achieves a 0.64% return, which is significantly lower than EWJ's 16.35% return. Over the past 10 years, EWG has underperformed EWJ with an annualized return of 7.59%, while EWJ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.37% annualized return.
EWG
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 4.44%
- 1Y
- 3.23%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- YTD
- 16.35%
- 6M
- 17.97%
- 1Y
- 32.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
EWG vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 0.64% | 35.79% | 9.79% | 23.35% | -22.27% | 5.84% | 10.09% | 19.15% | -21.40% | 27.42% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 16.35% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWG and EWJ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996 | 0.57 |
The correlation between EWG and EWJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
EWG vs. EWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWG
EWJ
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Energy
-
Industrials
EWG
EWJ
Financial Services
EWG
EWJ
Technology
EWG
EWJ
Consumer Cyclical
EWG
EWJ
Communication Services
EWG
EWJ
Healthcare
EWG
EWJ
Basic Materials
EWG
EWJ
Utilities
EWG
EWJ
Consumer Defensive
EWG
EWJ
Real Estate
EWG
EWJ
Energy
EWG
-
EWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWG vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank
EWG
EWJ
EWG vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWG | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.31 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 2.40 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 8.14 | -7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWG | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 1.68 | -1.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.48 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.54 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.11 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
EWG vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWG drawdown since its inception was -67.57%, which is greater than EWJ's maximum drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWG and EWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWG | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.57% | -60.93% | -6.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.54% | -13.59% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -14.68% | -1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.44% | -33.14% | -10.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.80% | -33.14% | -13.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -0.03% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.20% | -21.74% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.89% | 4.01% | +0.88% |
Volatility
EWG vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) at 4.33%. This indicates that EWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWG | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 4.33% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 15.02% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.28% | 19.53% | -2.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 18.23% | +2.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 17.27% | +3.84% |
EWG vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EWG and EWJ have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
EWG vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison
EWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than EWJ's 3.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF | 1.59% | 1.60% | 2.38% | 2.56% | 3.24% | 2.70% | 1.67% | 2.51% | 2.93% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.93% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.89% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWG and EWJ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWG has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to EWJ (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWG dropped -67.57% vs EWJ's -60.93%.
On 10-year performance, EWJ leads with 9.37% vs 7.59% for EWG. Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWJ has performed better with a 9.37% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWG and EWJ have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.89%, compared with 1.59% for EWG.
EWG is categorized as Europe Equities, while EWJ is Japan Equities. EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index, while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index.
EWJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWG and EWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer