EWC vs. SLV
EWC (iShares MSCI Canada ETF) and SLV (iShares Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - EWC is a Canada Equities fund tracking the MSCI Canada Index, while SLV is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWC returned 11.19%/yr vs 15.55%/yr for SLV. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EWC charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SLV.
Performance
EWC vs. SLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EWC achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's 2.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EWC has underperformed SLV with an annualized return of 11.19%, while SLV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.
EWC
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 12.75%
- 1Y
- 31.36%
- 3Y*
- 21.89%
- 5Y*
- 11.19%
- 10Y*
- 11.19%
SLV
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 24.76%
- 1Y
- 110.59%
- 3Y*
- 45.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.55%
EWC vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 8.73% | 35.92% | 12.38% | 14.73% | -12.95% | 26.98% | 5.52% | 27.58% | -17.16% | 15.73% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 2.78% | 144.66% | 20.89% | -1.09% | 2.37% | -12.45% | 47.30% | 14.88% | -9.19% | 5.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWC and SLV is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2006 | 0.41 |
EWC vs. SLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EWC
SLV
Financial Services
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
EWC
SLV
-
Energy
EWC
SLV
-
Basic Materials
EWC
SLV
Industrials
EWC
SLV
-
Technology
EWC
SLV
-
Consumer Cyclical
EWC
SLV
-
Consumer Defensive
EWC
SLV
-
Utilities
EWC
SLV
-
Communication Services
EWC
SLV
-
Real Estate
EWC
SLV
-
Healthcare
EWC
-
SLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EWC vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank
EWC
SLV
EWC vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EWC | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.35 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.70 | 2.62 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.25 | 5.64 | +9.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EWC | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 1.89 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.58 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.49 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.25 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
EWC vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWC drawdown since its inception was -60.75%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWC and SLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EWC | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -76.28% | +15.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -42.45% | +33.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.97% | -42.45% | +29.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.81% | -42.45% | +17.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.66% | -42.81% | +0.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.38% | -37.30% | +35.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -44.67% | +31.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 19.67% | -17.61% |
Volatility
EWC vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC) is 3.46%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 16.30%. This indicates that EWC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EWC | SLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 16.30% | -12.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 58.31% | -47.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 58.90% | -44.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 36.15% | -18.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.74% | 31.84% | -13.10% |
EWC vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWC has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EWC vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison
EWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWC iShares MSCI Canada ETF | 1.33% | 1.45% | 2.23% | 2.27% | 2.34% | 1.85% | 2.09% | 2.16% | 2.65% | 1.97% | 1.75% | 2.34% |
SLV iShares Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EWC and SLV have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SLV has higher volatility (16.30%) compared to EWC (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWC dropped -60.75% vs SLV's -76.28%.
On 10-year performance, SLV leads with 15.55% vs 11.19% for EWC. On fees, EWC is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWC has been the lower-risk option at 3.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLV has performed better with a 15.55% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWC is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.
EWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.
EWC is categorized as Canada Equities, while SLV is Silver. EWC tracks MSCI Canada Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for EWC and 0.50% for SLV.
EWC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EWC and SLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer