PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EWA vs. EWI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EWA vs. EWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly lower than EWI's 10.57% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has underperformed EWI with an annualized return of 8.07%, while EWI has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.


EWA

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
8.84%
6M
7.65%
1Y
11.12%
3Y*
11.35%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
8.07%

EWI

1D
0.48%
1M
1.18%
YTD
10.57%
6M
10.92%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
27.00%
5Y*
16.93%
10Y*
14.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWA vs. EWI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EWA
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF
8.84%13.35%1.60%13.81%-5.92%8.93%8.29%22.45%-12.04%19.88%
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
10.57%55.72%10.23%30.63%-14.16%14.38%1.69%26.98%-17.18%28.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EWA and EWI is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 1996

0.55

The correlation between EWA and EWI shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWA vs. EWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EWA
EWI

Financial Services

41.4%
50.1%

Basic Materials

26.4%
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
8.8%

Real Estate

5.1%

-

Healthcare

4.3%
1.3%

Industrials

4.2%
10.5%

Energy

4.2%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
0.9%

Communication Services

1.9%
2.6%

Utilities

1.6%
17.8%

Technology

1.0%

-

Financial Services

EWA
41.4%
EWI
50.1%

Basic Materials

EWA
26.4%
EWI
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

EWA
6.5%
EWI
8.8%

Real Estate

EWA
5.1%
EWI

-

Healthcare

EWA
4.3%
EWI
1.3%

Industrials

EWA
4.2%
EWI
10.5%

Energy

EWA
4.2%
EWI
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

EWA
3.6%
EWI
0.9%

Communication Services

EWA
1.9%
EWI
2.6%

Utilities

EWA
1.6%
EWI
17.8%

Technology

EWA
1.0%
EWI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EWA vs. EWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWA
EWA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
EWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWA Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
EWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWA Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

EWI
EWI Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
EWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWI Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
EWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWI Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWA vs. EWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EWAEWIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.25

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

2.19

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.97

8.10

-5.13

EWA vs. EWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the EWI Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWA and EWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EWA vs. EWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, roughly equal to the maximum EWI drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and EWI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EWAEWIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.98%

-70.38%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.01%

-12.48%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-16.80%

-5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-35.25%

+10.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.54%

-43.00%

-2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-3.00%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-28.88%

+17.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.76%

3.36%

+0.40%

Volatility

EWA vs. EWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and iShares MSCI Italy ETF (EWI) have volatilities of 5.69% and 5.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EWAEWIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

5.66%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.64%

15.43%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

18.44%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

21.15%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.50%

22.60%

-0.10%

EWA vs. EWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWI's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EWA vs. EWI - Dividend Comparison

EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than EWI's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWA
iShares MSCI-Australia ETF
3.02%3.21%3.71%3.72%5.28%5.08%2.02%3.97%6.11%4.44%4.03%5.48%
EWI
iShares MSCI Italy ETF
3.18%2.80%4.07%3.40%4.57%2.63%1.66%3.80%4.71%2.19%3.64%2.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


EWA and EWI have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWA has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to EWI (5.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWA dropped -66.98% vs EWI's -70.38%.

On 10-year performance, EWI leads with 14.23% vs 8.07% for EWA. On fees, EWI is cheaper at 0.49% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWI has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWI is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWA.

EWI has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 3.02% for EWA.

EWA is categorized as Australia Equities, while EWI is Europe Equities. EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index, while EWI tracks MSCI Italy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWA and 0.49% for EWI.

EWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EWA and EWI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer