EWA vs. EWG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EWA (iShares MSCI-Australia ETF) and EWG (iShares MSCI Germany ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EWA is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Australia Index, while EWG is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Germany Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EWA returned 8.41%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for EWG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EWA charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWG.

Performance

EWA vs. EWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EWA achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly higher than EWG's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, EWA has outperformed EWG with an annualized return of 8.41%, while EWG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.59% annualized return.

EWA

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 11.26%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 15.43%
• 3Y*: 12.60%
• 5Y*: 5.51%
• 10Y*: 8.41%

EWG

• 1D: -1.84%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 0.64%
• 6M: 4.44%
• 1Y: 3.23%
• 3Y*: 16.95%
• 5Y*: 5.94%
• 10Y*: 7.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EWA vs. EWG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF	11.26%	13.35%	1.60%	13.81%	-5.92%	8.93%	8.29%	22.45%	-12.04%	19.88%
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF	0.64%	35.79%	9.79%	23.35%	-22.27%	5.84%	10.09%	19.15%	-21.40%	27.42%

Correlation

The correlation between EWA and EWG is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 1996	0.59

The correlation between EWA and EWG shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EWA vs. EWG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EWA	EWG
Financial Services	43.6%	21.6%
Basic Materials	23.0%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	8.2%
Real Estate	5.0%	1.3%
Healthcare	4.9%	6.1%
Energy	4.5%	-
Industrials	4.5%	30.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	1.4%
Communication Services	2.0%	6.6%
Utilities	1.7%	4.9%
Technology	1.1%	13.8%

Return for Risk

EWA vs. EWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EWA

EWA Risk / Return Rank: 27
EWA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
EWA Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
EWA Omega Ratio Rank: 24
EWA Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
EWA Martin Ratio Rank: 30

EWG

EWG Risk / Return Rank: 11
EWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
EWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
EWG Omega Ratio Rank: 11
EWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EWG Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EWA vs. EWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) and iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EWA	EWG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	0.19	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	0.38	+0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.05	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	0.22	+1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.43	0.66	+3.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EWA vs. EWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EWA Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is higher than the EWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EWA and EWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EWA	EWG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92	0.19	+0.73
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	0.29	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	0.36	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.25	+0.04

Drawdowns

EWA vs. EWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EWA drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, roughly equal to the maximum EWG drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWA and EWG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EWA	EWG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.98%	-67.57%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-14.54%	+4.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.91%	-15.81%	-6.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.87%	-43.44%	+18.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.54%	-46.80%	+1.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.70%	-4.02%	+0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.33%	-19.20%	+7.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.49%	4.89%	-1.40%

Volatility

EWA vs. EWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI-Australia ETF (EWA) is 5.46%, while iShares MSCI Germany ETF (EWG) has a volatility of 6.49%. This indicates that EWA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EWA	EWG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	6.49%	-1.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.98%	14.18%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.87%	17.28%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	20.48%	-0.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.61%	21.11%	+1.50%

EWA vs. EWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

EWA has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EWA vs. EWG - Dividend Comparison

EWA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than EWG's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EWA iShares MSCI-Australia ETF	2.89%	3.21%	3.71%	3.72%	5.28%	5.08%	2.02%	3.97%	6.11%	4.44%	4.03%	5.48%
EWG iShares MSCI Germany ETF	1.59%	1.60%	2.38%	2.56%	3.24%	2.70%	1.67%	2.51%	2.93%	2.06%	2.35%	1.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EWA and EWG in my portfolio?

EWA and EWG have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EWA or EWG?

EWG has higher volatility (6.49%) compared to EWA (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EWA dropped -66.98% vs EWG's -67.57%.

Which ETF is better, EWA or EWG?

On 10-year performance, EWA leads with 8.41% vs 7.59% for EWG. On fees, EWG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWA has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EWA or EWG?

Over the 10-year period, EWA has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EWA or EWG?

EWG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EWA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EWA or EWG?

EWA has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 1.59% for EWG.

What is the main difference between EWA and EWG?

EWA is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EWG is Europe Equities. EWA tracks MSCI Australia Index, while EWG tracks MSCI Germany Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for EWA and 0.49% for EWG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EWA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.