EVYM vs. XMPT

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EVYM (Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF) and XMPT (VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. EVYM is actively managed, while XMPT is passively managed. Over the past year, EVYM returned 10.47% vs 11.92% for XMPT. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EVYM charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.97%/yr for XMPT.

Performance

EVYM vs. XMPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVYM achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly higher than XMPT's 2.48% return.

EVYM

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 4.17%
• 1Y: 10.47%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XMPT

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 2.48%
• 6M: 2.18%
• 1Y: 11.92%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: -1.14%
• 10Y*: 2.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVYM vs. XMPT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF	3.53%	3.70%
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF	2.48%	3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between EVYM and XMPT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025	0.51

The correlation between EVYM and XMPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVYM vs. XMPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVYM

EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 85
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

XMPT

XMPT Risk / Return Rank: 48
XMPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XMPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XMPT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XMPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
XMPT Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVYM vs. XMPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVYM	XMPT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	1.66	+1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.42	2.46	+1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.33	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	1.82	+1.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.36	7.43	+6.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVYM vs. XMPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the XMPT Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVYM and XMPT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVYM	XMPT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.85	1.66	+1.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.42	+0.54

Drawdowns

EVYM vs. XMPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVYM drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, smaller than the maximum XMPT drawdown of -35.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVYM and XMPT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVYM	XMPT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.08%	-35.24%	+29.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.77%	-6.57%	+3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-35.24%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-8.82%	+8.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.48%	-8.82%	+7.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.73%	1.61%	-0.88%

Volatility

EVYM vs. XMPT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) is 0.95%, while VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) has a volatility of 2.31%. This indicates that EVYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVYM	XMPT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.95%	2.31%	-1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.57%	6.03%	-3.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.69%	7.21%	-3.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.07%	9.35%	-3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.07%	10.36%	-4.29%

EVYM vs. XMPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVYM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than XMPT's 1.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVYM vs. XMPT - Dividend Comparison

EVYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than XMPT's 6.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVYM Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF	4.77%	3.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF	6.33%	5.87%	5.35%	3.81%	5.12%	3.74%	3.79%	4.08%	5.05%	4.84%	5.35%	5.24%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVYM and XMPT in my portfolio?

EVYM and XMPT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVYM or XMPT?

XMPT has higher volatility (2.31%) compared to EVYM (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVYM dropped -6.08% vs XMPT's -35.24%.

Which ETF is better, EVYM or XMPT?

On 1-year performance, XMPT leads with 11.92% vs 10.47% for EVYM. On fees, EVYM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EVYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVYM or XMPT?

Over the 1-year period, XMPT has performed better with a 11.92% return vs 10.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVYM or XMPT?

EVYM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.97% for XMPT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVYM or XMPT?

XMPT has the higher dividend yield at 6.33%, compared with 4.77% for EVYM.

What is the main difference between EVYM and XMPT?

They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EVYM and 1.97% for XMPT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.