PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVYM vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVYM vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVYM achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 360.26% return.


EVYM

1D
0.23%
1M
1.19%
YTD
3.53%
6M
4.17%
1Y
10.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDL

1D
-7.05%
1M
102.52%
YTD
360.26%
6M
344.53%
1Y
1,075.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVYM vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EVYM and AMDL is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2025

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVYM vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVYM
EVYM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EVYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVYM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
EVYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVYM vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVYMAMDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.61

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

19.36

-15.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.36

38.01

-23.65

EVYM vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVYM Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is lower than the AMDL Sharpe Ratio of 8.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVYM and AMDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVYMAMDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.85

8.38

-5.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.51

+0.44

Drawdowns

EVYM vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVYM drawdown since its inception was -6.08%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVYM and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVYMAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-88.63%

+82.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-56.13%

+53.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.05%

+7.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.48%

-48.51%

+47.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

28.54%

-27.81%

Volatility

EVYM vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance High Income Municipal ETF (EVYM) is 0.95%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) has a volatility of 47.19%. This indicates that EVYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVYMAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

47.19%

-46.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

94.32%

-91.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

129.64%

-125.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.07%

116.59%

-110.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.07%

116.59%

-110.52%

EVYM vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVYM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVYM vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

EVYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


EVYM and AMDL have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDL has higher volatility (47.19%) compared to EVYM (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVYM dropped -6.08% vs AMDL's -88.63%.

On 1-year performance, AMDL leads with 1075.21% vs 10.47% for EVYM. On fees, EVYM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, EVYM has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDL has performed better with a 1075.21% return vs 10.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVYM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMDL.

EVYM has the higher dividend yield at 4.77%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

EVYM is categorized as High Yield Muni, while AMDL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for EVYM and 1.15% for AMDL.

AMDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.38 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVYM and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer