PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVX vs. TOLZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVX vs. TOLZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVX achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than TOLZ's 11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, EVX has outperformed TOLZ with an annualized return of 12.03%, while TOLZ has yielded a comparatively lower 7.75% annualized return.


EVX

1D
1.54%
1M
-0.67%
YTD
2.99%
6M
2.46%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
10.41%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
12.03%

TOLZ

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.51%
1Y
13.97%
3Y*
14.17%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
7.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVX vs. TOLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EVX
VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF
2.99%11.72%12.99%12.97%-10.58%27.47%13.28%28.41%-3.82%16.05%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
11.31%14.76%11.67%6.18%-4.25%20.47%-9.46%26.84%-7.90%13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EVX and TOLZ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2014

0.52

The correlation between EVX and TOLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EVX vs. TOLZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EVX
TOLZ

Industrials

85.2%
5.2%

Basic Materials

7.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
4.5%

Utilities

2.2%
22.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.8%

Financial Services

-

2.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

8.0%

Technology

-

0.4%

Energy

-0.0%
35.4%

Industrials

EVX
85.2%
TOLZ
5.2%

Basic Materials

EVX
7.5%
TOLZ

-

Consumer Defensive

EVX
5.1%
TOLZ
4.5%

Utilities

EVX
2.2%
TOLZ
22.2%

Communication Services

EVX

-

TOLZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

EVX

-

TOLZ
0.8%

Financial Services

EVX

-

TOLZ
2.0%

Healthcare

EVX

-

TOLZ

-

Real Estate

EVX

-

TOLZ
8.0%

Technology

EVX

-

TOLZ
0.4%

Energy

EVX
-0.0%
TOLZ
35.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVX vs. TOLZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVX
EVX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
EVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

TOLZ
TOLZ Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
TOLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TOLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TOLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TOLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TOLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVX vs. TOLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVXTOLZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.23

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

2.71

-2.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.15

8.20

-7.05

EVX vs. TOLZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the TOLZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVX and TOLZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVXTOLZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

1.36

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.61

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.48

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.41

+0.02

Drawdowns

EVX vs. TOLZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVX drawdown since its inception was -55.91%, which is greater than TOLZ's maximum drawdown of -39.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVX and TOLZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVXTOLZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.91%

-39.33%

-16.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.85%

-5.18%

-5.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.33%

-11.94%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

-21.85%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.01%

-39.33%

-1.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.96%

-3.13%

-3.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.76%

-6.63%

-2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

1.71%

+2.85%

Volatility

EVX vs. TOLZ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) and ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF (TOLZ) have volatilities of 3.52% and 3.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVXTOLZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

3.37%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

8.20%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

10.29%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

13.99%

+3.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.25%

16.29%

+3.96%

EVX vs. TOLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TOLZ's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVX vs. TOLZ - Dividend Comparison

EVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than TOLZ's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EVX
VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF
0.18%0.19%0.46%0.95%0.41%0.24%0.32%0.38%0.38%0.89%0.70%1.16%
TOLZ
ProShares DJ Brookfield Global Infrastructure ETF
3.66%3.99%3.53%3.34%3.01%3.28%3.16%2.96%3.63%3.30%2.62%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVX and TOLZ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to TOLZ (3.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVX dropped -55.91% vs TOLZ's -39.33%.

On 10-year performance, EVX leads with 12.03% vs 7.75% for TOLZ. On fees, TOLZ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, TOLZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EVX has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 7.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TOLZ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EVX.

TOLZ has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 0.18% for EVX.

EVX tracks NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index, while TOLZ tracks Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for EVX and 0.46% for TOLZ.

TOLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVX and TOLZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer