PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVUS vs. ROE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVUS vs. ROE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVUS achieves a 9.83% return, which is significantly lower than ROE's 19.29% return.


EVUS

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.26%
YTD
9.83%
6M
9.18%
1Y
20.48%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10Y*

ROE

1D
-2.17%
1M
2.62%
YTD
19.29%
6M
17.72%
1Y
35.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVUS vs. ROE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
9.83%13.31%14.23%2.53%
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
19.29%17.20%18.34%4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between EVUS and ROE is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023

0.86

The correlation between EVUS and ROE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVUS vs. ROE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVUS
EVUS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
EVUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EVUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ROE
ROE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVUS vs. ROE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) and Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EVUSROEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.42

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

4.09

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

17.99

-6.86

EVUS vs. ROE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is comparable to the ROE Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVUS and ROE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EVUS vs. ROE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVUS drawdown since its inception was -15.65%, smaller than the maximum ROE drawdown of -19.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVUS and ROE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVUSROEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.65%

-19.10%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.72%

-8.66%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-2.17%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.75%

-2.57%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

1.96%

-0.12%

Volatility

EVUS vs. ROE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF (EVUS) is 3.27%, while Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that EVUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVUSROEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

6.40%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

11.76%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

14.84%

-4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.72%

15.99%

-3.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.72%

15.99%

-3.27%

EVUS vs. ROE - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVUS has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ROE's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVUS vs. ROE - Dividend Comparison

EVUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than ROE's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EVUS
Ishares ESG Aware MSCI USA Value ETF
1.53%1.62%1.99%2.31%
ROE
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF
0.95%0.97%1.18%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVUS and ROE have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROE has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to EVUS (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVUS dropped -15.65% vs ROE's -19.10%.

On 1-year performance, ROE leads with 35.20% vs 20.48% for EVUS. On fees, EVUS is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, EVUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROE has performed better with a 35.20% return vs 20.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVUS is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

EVUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.95% for ROE.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Astoria. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for EVUS and 0.49% for ROE.

ROE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVUS and ROE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer