EVTR vs. IUSB
EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) and IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. EVTR is actively managed, while IUSB is passively managed. Over the past year, EVTR returned 5.42% vs 5.05% for IUSB. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EVTR charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IUSB.
Performance
EVTR vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EVTR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than IUSB's 0.56% return.
EVTR
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 5.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IUSB
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
EVTR vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | 0.43% | 8.10% | 4.07% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.56% | 7.38% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between EVTR and IUSB is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between EVTR and IUSB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EVTR vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank
EVTR
IUSB
EVTR vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EVTR | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.01 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.03 | 6.08 | -0.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EVTR | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.42 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.34 | 0.46 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
EVTR vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum IUSB drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and IUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EVTR | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -17.90% | +13.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -2.53% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.20% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -3.59% | +2.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | 0.83% | +0.07% |
Volatility
EVTR vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) at 1.24%. This indicates that EVTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EVTR | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.41% | 1.24% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 2.62% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 3.62% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 5.79% | -1.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.30% | 5.04% | -0.74% |
EVTR vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
EVTR vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than IUSB's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF | 4.67% | 4.51% | 4.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.23% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, EVTR and IUSB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EVTR has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to IUSB (1.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVTR dropped -4.08% vs IUSB's -17.90%.
On 1-year performance, EVTR leads with 5.42% vs 5.05% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IUSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EVTR has performed better with a 5.42% return vs 5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for EVTR.
EVTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 4.23% for IUSB.
They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EVTR and 0.06% for IUSB.
EVTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EVTR and IUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer