EVTR vs. HFSI

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) and HFSI (Hartford Strategic Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVTR is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Eaton Vance, while HFSI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Hartford. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVTR returned 5.42% vs 7.98% for HFSI. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EVTR charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for HFSI.

Performance

EVTR vs. HFSI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVTR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than HFSI's 1.55% return.

EVTR

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HFSI

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 0.85%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 7.98%
• 3Y*: 8.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVTR vs. HFSI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	0.43%	8.10%	4.07%
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF	1.55%	9.56%	6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between EVTR and HFSI is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.85

The correlation between EVTR and HFSI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVTR vs. HFSI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 42
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

HFSI

HFSI Risk / Return Rank: 67
HFSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
HFSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
HFSI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HFSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
HFSI Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVTR vs. HFSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVTR	HFSI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.27	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	3.37	-1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.44	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	2.62	-0.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	10.50	-4.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVTR vs. HFSI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the HFSI Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVTR and HFSI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVTR	HFSI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	2.27	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.55	+0.79

Drawdowns

EVTR vs. HFSI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum HFSI drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and HFSI.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVTR	HFSI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-19.34%	+15.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-3.06%	+0.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-0.03%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-5.72%	+4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	0.76%	+0.14%

Volatility

EVTR vs. HFSI - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to Hartford Strategic Income ETF (HFSI) at 1.13%. This indicates that EVTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVTR	HFSI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	1.13%	+0.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	2.52%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	3.59%	+0.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.30%	4.97%	-0.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	4.97%	-0.67%

EVTR vs. HFSI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSI's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVTR vs. HFSI - Dividend Comparison

EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than HFSI's 5.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.67%	4.51%	4.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HFSI Hartford Strategic Income ETF	5.53%	5.67%	6.51%	5.77%	4.87%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVTR and HFSI in my portfolio?

EVTR and HFSI have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVTR or HFSI?

EVTR has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to HFSI (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVTR dropped -4.08% vs HFSI's -19.34%.

Which ETF is better, EVTR or HFSI?

On 1-year performance, HFSI leads with 7.98% vs 5.42% for EVTR. On fees, EVTR is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, HFSI has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVTR or HFSI?

Over the 1-year period, HFSI has performed better with a 7.98% return vs 5.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVTR or HFSI?

EVTR is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HFSI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVTR or HFSI?

HFSI has the higher dividend yield at 5.53%, compared with 4.67% for EVTR.

What is the main difference between EVTR and HFSI?

EVTR is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while HFSI is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Eaton Vance and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for EVTR and 0.49% for HFSI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.