EVTR vs. EBABX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

EVTR (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF) and EBABX (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds from Eaton Vance. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVTR returned 5.42% vs 5.47% for EBABX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EVTR charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for EBABX.

Performance

EVTR vs. EBABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVTR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than EBABX's 0.22% return.

EVTR

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 6M: 0.56%
• 1Y: 5.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBABX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 5.47%
• 3Y*: 5.71%
• 5Y*: 1.09%
• 10Y*: 3.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVTR vs. EBABX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	0.43%	8.10%	4.07%
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	0.22%	8.87%	4.18%

Correlation

The correlation between EVTR and EBABX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2024	0.88

The correlation between EVTR and EBABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EVTR vs. EBABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVTR

EVTR Risk / Return Rank: 42
EVTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
EVTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EVTR Omega Ratio Rank: 42
EVTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
EVTR Martin Ratio Rank: 39

EBABX

EBABX Risk / Return Rank: 28
EBABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
EBABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
EBABX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
EBABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EBABX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVTR vs. EBABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EVTR	EBABX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.52	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.20	2.28	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	1.84	+0.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	5.63	+0.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EVTR vs. EBABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the EBABX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVTR and EBABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EVTR	EBABX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50	1.52	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.77	+0.57

Drawdowns

EVTR vs. EBABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVTR drawdown since its inception was -4.08%, smaller than the maximum EBABX drawdown of -17.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVTR and EBABX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVTR	EBABX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-17.19%	+13.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.86%	-3.27%	+0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.68%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-1.66%	+0.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.97%	-3.65%	+2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.90%	1.07%	-0.17%

Volatility

EVTR vs. EBABX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF (EVTR) and Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVTR	EBABX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	1.48%	-0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.77%	2.93%	-0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.66%	3.95%	-0.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.30%	5.31%	-1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.30%	4.68%	-0.38%

EVTR vs. EBABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVTR has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than EBABX's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVTR vs. EBABX - Dividend Comparison

EVTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than EBABX's 4.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	4.89%	4.89%	5.31%	3.83%	3.77%	3.23%	3.64%	3.71%	3.89%	3.29%	3.66%	5.41%
EVTR Eaton Vance Total Return Bond ETF	4.67%	4.51%	4.26%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVTR and EBABX in my portfolio?

EVTR and EBABX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVTR or EBABX?

EBABX has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to EVTR (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVTR dropped -4.08% vs EBABX's -17.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.