EBABX vs. LCTRX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EBABX (Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A) and LCTRX (Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, EBABX returned 3.33%/yr vs 4.83%/yr for LCTRX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EBABX charges 0.73%/yr vs 2.33%/yr for LCTRX.

Performance

EBABX vs. LCTRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBABX achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than LCTRX's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EBABX has underperformed LCTRX with an annualized return of 3.33%, while LCTRX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.83% annualized return.

EBABX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 0.68%
• 1Y: 6.18%
• 3Y*: 5.78%
• 5Y*: 1.14%
• 10Y*: 3.33%

LCTRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 2.24%
• 1Y: 4.84%
• 3Y*: 5.86%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: 4.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBABX vs. LCTRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	0.41%	8.87%	4.21%	5.30%	-13.08%	2.76%	5.62%	10.54%	-1.09%	7.44%
LCTRX Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares	1.78%	4.72%	6.03%	8.26%	2.22%	1.99%	12.07%	1.15%	6.01%	4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between EBABX and LCTRX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2010	0.16

Over the past year, EBABX and LCTRX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

EBABX vs. LCTRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBABX

EBABX Risk / Return Rank: 27
EBABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
EBABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
EBABX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
EBABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
EBABX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

LCTRX

LCTRX Risk / Return Rank: 91
LCTRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LCTRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
LCTRX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LCTRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
LCTRX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBABX vs. LCTRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) and Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBABX	LCTRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.60	-1.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	5.58	-3.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.95	-0.68
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	4.62	-2.62
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.18	19.23	-13.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBABX vs. LCTRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBABX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the LCTRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBABX and LCTRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBABX	LCTRX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	2.60	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	2.19	-1.97
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.77	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.70	+0.07

Drawdowns

EBABX vs. LCTRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBABX drawdown since its inception was -17.19%, smaller than the maximum LCTRX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBABX and LCTRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBABX	LCTRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.19%	-26.09%	+8.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.27%	-1.17%	-2.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.68%	-1.33%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.19%	-3.82%	-13.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-17.19%	-23.93%	+6.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.47%	0.00%	-1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-4.12%	+0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.06%	0.28%	+0.78%

Volatility

EBABX vs. LCTRX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A (EBABX) has a higher volatility of 1.52% compared to Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares (LCTRX) at 0.58%. This indicates that EBABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCTRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBABX	LCTRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.52%	0.58%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.97%	1.46%	+1.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96%	1.91%	+2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.31%	2.45%	+2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.69%	6.31%	-1.62%

EBABX vs. LCTRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBABX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than LCTRX's 2.33% expense ratio.

Dividends

EBABX vs. LCTRX - Dividend Comparison

EBABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than LCTRX's 5.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EBABX Eaton Vance Total Return Bond Fund Class A	4.88%	4.89%	5.31%	3.83%	3.77%	3.23%	3.64%	3.71%	3.89%	3.29%	3.66%	5.41%
LCTRX Leader Capital High Quality Floating Rate Fund Investor Shares	5.28%	5.53%	5.57%	5.31%	2.18%	1.69%	1.17%	2.40%	3.31%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBABX and LCTRX in my portfolio?

EBABX and LCTRX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBABX or LCTRX?

EBABX has higher volatility (1.52%) compared to LCTRX (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBABX dropped -17.19% vs LCTRX's -26.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCTRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.