EVMT vs. RINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EVMT (Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EVMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while RINT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Russell. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EVMT returned 31.03% vs 22.58% for RINT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EVMT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for RINT.

Performance

EVMT vs. RINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVMT achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than RINT's 8.14% return.

EVMT

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: -7.56%
• YTD: 4.92%
• 6M: 9.06%
• 1Y: 31.03%
• 3Y*: 1.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RINT

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 6M: 8.01%
• 1Y: 22.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVMT vs. RINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	4.92%	23.34%
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	8.14%	15.69%

Correlation

The correlation between EVMT and RINT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

EVMT vs. RINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVMT

EVMT Risk / Return Rank: 69
EVMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
EVMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EVMT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EVMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EVMT Martin Ratio Rank: 69

RINT

RINT Risk / Return Rank: 46
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVMT vs. RINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) and Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EVMT	RINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.01	1.49	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	2.11	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.27	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.44	1.90	+1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.60	7.15	+4.45

EVMT vs. RINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVMT Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is higher than the RINT Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVMT and RINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EVMT vs. RINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVMT drawdown since its inception was -48.34%, which is greater than RINT's maximum drawdown of -11.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVMT and RINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	EVMT	RINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.34%	-11.91%	-36.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.05%	-11.91%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-27.57%	-1.68%	-25.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.58%	-1.78%	-32.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	3.16%	-0.48%

Volatility

EVMT vs. RINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (EVMT) is 4.40%, while Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a volatility of 4.85%. This indicates that EVMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EVMT	RINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.40%	4.85%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.90%	13.03%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.50%	15.27%	+0.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.46%	14.93%	+5.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.46%	14.93%	+5.53%

EVMT vs. RINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVMT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than RINT's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

EVMT vs. RINT - Dividend Comparison

EVMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.25%, more than RINT's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EVMT Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF	11.25%	11.80%	3.62%	5.49%	0.86%
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	0.82%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EVMT and RINT in my portfolio?

EVMT and RINT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EVMT or RINT?

RINT has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to EVMT (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVMT dropped -48.34% vs RINT's -11.91%.

Which ETF is better, EVMT or RINT?

On 1-year performance, EVMT leads with 31.03% vs 22.58% for RINT. On fees, RINT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EVMT has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EVMT or RINT?

Over the 1-year period, EVMT has performed better with a 31.03% return vs 22.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EVMT or RINT?

RINT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EVMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EVMT or RINT?

EVMT has the higher dividend yield at 11.25%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.

What is the main difference between EVMT and RINT?

EVMT is categorized as Commodities, while RINT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Russell. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EVMT and 0.49% for RINT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.