PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EVLU vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EVLU vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EVLU achieves a 34.01% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 6.42% return.


EVLU

1D
-2.27%
1M
15.31%
YTD
34.01%
6M
37.37%
1Y
72.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EDIV

1D
-1.27%
1M
2.48%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.80%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
19.05%
5Y*
10.66%
10Y*
9.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EVLU vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
34.01%38.54%1.61%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
6.42%16.45%-1.21%

Correlation

The correlation between EVLU and EDIV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2024

0.79

The correlation between EVLU and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EVLU vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EVLU
EVLU Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
EVLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EVLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
EVLU Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EVLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
EVLU Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EVLU vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EVLUEDIVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.80

1.16

+2.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.71

1.70

+3.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.67

1.22

+0.45

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

1.37

+4.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.79

4.23

+16.56

EVLU vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EVLU Sharpe Ratio is 3.80, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EVLU and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EVLUEDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80

1.16

+2.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

0.17

+2.06

Drawdowns

EVLU vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EVLU drawdown since its inception was -17.17%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EVLU and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EVLUEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-53.36%

+36.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-10.36%

-2.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-4.07%

+1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-19.36%

+15.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.48%

3.34%

+0.14%

Volatility

EVLU vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF (EVLU) has a higher volatility of 9.17% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.11%. This indicates that EVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EVLUEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.17%

4.11%

+5.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

10.03%

+6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.04%

12.19%

+6.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

13.83%

+6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

17.49%

+2.44%

EVLU vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EVLU has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

EVLU vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

EVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than EDIV's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.50%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
EVLU
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor ETF
3.88%5.20%1.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EVLU and EDIV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EVLU has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to EDIV (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EVLU dropped -17.17% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 1-year performance, EVLU leads with 72.04% vs 14.08% for EDIV. On fees, EVLU is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EVLU has performed better with a 72.04% return vs 14.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EVLU is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.88% for EVLU.

EVLU tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Value Factor Select Index (Net), while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for EVLU and 0.49% for EDIV.

EVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EVLU and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer